The English language is nothing if not adaptable and creative. The corporate world has evolved along with the rest of society. Here are some examples of useful new terminology:

-Blamestorming                –Sitting around in a group discussing why a deadline was miss, a project failed; and most importantly, who was responsible.

-Seagull Manager             –A manager who flies in, makes a lot of noise, craps over everything, and then leaves

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-Chainsaw Consultant    –An outside expert brought in to reduce employee headcount, leaving the top brass with clean hands and consciences.

-Expert                                 –Person from out of town who has a PowerPoint program.

-Cube Farm                        –The office—a place filled with cubicles.

-Idea Hamsters                 –People who always have idea generators—not necessarily new or useful ideas.

-Mouse Potato                 –The new world online, wired in generation’s substitute for the couch potato.

-Prairie Dogging                –Someone yells or something drops and makes a noise, and dozens of heads pop up over the cubicle walls to see what’s going on.

-SITCOM                              –What yuppies turn into when they have children and one of them stops working. The other one stops working to stay home with the children. SITCOM is an acronym for Single Income Two Children, Oppressive Mortgage.

-Stress Puppy                    –The office person who thrives on being stressed out and being whiny.

-Tourists                              –Office people who have to take training classes just to get a vacation from their jobs. The expression is used thus: “We have three serious secretaries; the rest are just tourists.”

-Treeware                           –Hacker slang for printed documentation or other printed material.

-Xerox Subsidy                  –Euphemism for taking free photocopies (theft) from one’s workplace.

-Going Postal                     –Being totally stressed out and losing control. The obvious reference is to the unfortunate spate of postal employees who snapped and went on shooting rampages.

-Alpha Geek                       –The most knowledgeable and technically proficient person in an office—and usually considered a necessary social evil.

-GOOD job                          –Get-Out-Of-Debt job. A reasonable paying but uninteresting job which people take to pay of their debts and then quit as soon as they become solvent.

-Irritainment                      –Office pep-talks with graphics. Also entertainment and media spectacles that are annoying, but somehow seduce bored office workers to watch them—such as any of the dozens of entertainer award shows.

-Percussive Management            –The delicate art of whacking an electronic device to get it to work again.

-Uninstalled                       –Being fired. Also referred to as Decruitment.

-Vulcan Nerve Pinch       –Taxing hand positions required to reach all the appropriate keys for certain computer demands repetitively.

 

 

Posted in Featured | Leave a comment

 

 

1. –Silence: the Final Frontier (where no woman has gone before).

 

2. –The undiscovered Side of Banking: Making Deposits.

 

3. –The Path to Cure for the Imelda Marcos Syndrome: A New Mantra, “I do not

need new shoes; I do not need new shoes.”

 

4. –New Age Party Tips: 1. You Do Not Need a New Outfit. (Prerequisite-Course 2)

 

5.  –Management Strategies: 1. Discover the Fun of Letting Hubby’s Minor Household Chores Go Until After the Game.

 

6. –Bathroom Etiquette: 101-Men Need Space in the Bathroom Cabinet.

 

7. –Bathroom Etiquette: 201-His Razor is His.

 

8. –Valuation: “Just Because It’s Not Important to You…”

 

9. –Communication Skills Series: 101-Getting What You Want Without Nagging. 102-Thinking Before Speaking. 103-Tears are the Last Resort, Not the First.

10. –Driving Safely: 101-An Acquirable Skill. 102-Introduction to Parking. 103-Advanced Parking: Reversing Into a Space. 104-You Do Not Have to Drive Around for Thirty Minutes to Find a Space Near the Entrance to the Mall. Courses taught by male faculty.

 

11. –Telephone Skills. 101-Technique for Hanging Up.

 

12. –Cooking Skills: 101-Bringing Back the Oldies (Bacon, Eggs, Butter). 102-Food Items Not Fit for Human Consumption (Bran, Tofu, Lettuce Wraps). 103-The Fine Art of Avoiding Your Latest Diet Fad on Others. Courses taught by male faculty.
13. –The Fine Art of Accepting Compliments Gracefully.
14. –Dancing: Why Men Don’t Like to.
15. –Sex: It’s for Married Couples, Too.
16. –Classic Clothing: It’s About Wearing Clothes You Already Have.
17. –Household Dust: A Harmless Natural Material That Only Women Notice.
18. –Laundry Integration: How to Wash All Laundry Together and Enjoy it.
19. –Things for Women Only: Ballet, Lettuce Wraps, Pink Slippers, Yoga, and Quiche.
20. –Things for Men Only: TV Remotes, the TV series Justified, outdoor relief.
21. –Sexy Lingerie: Okay After Marriage and Children.
Posted in Featured | Leave a comment

MEDICAL TERM                                 LAY EXPLANATION

Artery                                                   The study of fine paintings.

Barium                                                  What you do when CPR fails.

Cesarean Section                             A district in ancient Rome

Colic                                                       A useful sheep dog

Coma                                                    A curvy punctuation mark

Congenital                                          Very friendly

Dilate                                                    To live a long time

Fester                                                   Quicker

G.I. Series                                           Baseball games between teams of soldiers

The Grippe                                         A favorite suitcase

Hangnail                                               Coat hook

Medical Staff                                     An old doctor’s cane

Minor operation                               Digging coal

Morbid                                                 A higher offer

Nitrate                                                  Lower than the day rate

Node                                                     Was aware of

Organic                                                 A religious piece of music played on a keyed instrument

Outpatient                                          A person who just fainted

Post-Operative                                 A USPS letter carrier

Protein                                                 In favor of adolescents

Secretion                                             Hiding stuff

Serology                                              Study of English knighthood

Tablet                                                   Prior to 2002, a small table

Tumor                                                   More than a pair

Urine                                                     Yours. Also, the opposite of “you’re out.”

Varicose veins                                   Blood vessels that are very near each other

 

No need to thank me; I’m just glad to share.

Posted in Featured | Leave a comment

The female staff offers the following courses to men of all ages and marital status. Please be aware that some of the courses have been changed for simplicity’s sake.

Course #                              Course Title

1 –Combatting stupidity—beginner’s course.
2. –You, too, can do housework.
3. –PMS. Learning to keep your mouth shut.
4. –How to fill an ice tray (Course 1 is a prerequisite).
5. –Wives and girlfriends DO NOT want sleazy underthings for Christmas. Money works better.
6. –Understanding the female response to the male coming home drunk in the wee hours of the night.
7. — New laundry techniques (Formerly, Don’t Wash My Silks).
8. — Parenting—There’s more than just the conception part.
9. — New Interests in Life: Learn to Cook
10. — Spelling made simple. Even men can get it right (Course 1 is a prerequisite).
11. — The Weaker Sex—you.
12. — Reasons to Give Flowers (Course 1 is a prerequisite)
13. –Innovative ways to say awake after eight.
14. — The only acceptable place to relieve yourself (See Course 1 for bathrooms)
15. — The Garbage—tricks for getting it to the curb.
16. — Toilet instruction 101: How to put the lid down. 201: Where the yellow should and should not be.
17. — Shopping with your mate 101: How to avoid getting lost. 102: She doesn’t want to look at tools.301: You really can help her look for clothes. It’s notthat hard.
18. — Weekend and “sports” are not synonymous.
19. — The remote control 101: You can get over your dependency.201: She can work it just fine.
20. — How to change your underwear—one easy step.
21. — Parenting psychology 101: How not to behave younger than your children.  201: They have friends. You’re the dad.
22. — Male bonding is archaic after you’re married.
23. –Things to do for Fun: Snow shoveling, trash removal, picking up your clothes.

 

Be patient, there are similar courses for women.

Posted in Featured | Leave a comment

Here are a few Dumb Men Jokes for a change of pace:

-Why are all dumb blond jokes one-liners?                                          So men can understand them.

-What is the difference between men and government bonds?                Government bonds mature.

-What is a man’s idea of helping with the housework?                   Lifting his legs; so she can vacuum.

-Why is psychoanalysis a lot quicker for men than women?          When it’s time to go back to his childhood, the man is pretty much already there.

-What did God say after He created men?                                            “I can do better than this.”

-How do men define a 50-50 relationship?                                           Woman cooks, man eats. Woman cleans; man dirties. Woman irons; man wrinkles.

-What is the best way to force a man to do sit-ups?                         Place the remote between his toes.

-How do men exercise at the beach?”                                                    By sucking in their stomachs everytime a bikini walks by.

-What does a man consider to be a 7-course meal?                          A hot-dog and a six-pack.

-How are married men like pasta?                                                            They are always in hot water; they lack taste; and they always need dough.

-Why is it good that there are now female astronauts?                  So when the crew gets lost in space, at least the woman will ask for directions.

Nothing personal here. Read the next blogpost for help for men to deal with a world with women in it.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Featured | Leave a comment

“Australia experienced the worst and most consistent dry period in its recorded history over much of the past decade. The Murray River failed to reach the sea for the first time ever in 2002. Fires swept much of the country, and dust storms blanketed major cities for days. Australia’s sheep population dropped by 50 percent, and rice and cotton production collapsed in some years. Tens of thousands of farm families gave up their livelihoods.” Scientific American, Devastating Drought Seems Inevitable in American West, Peter H. Gleick, and Matthew Heberger, January 5, 2011.

American scientists point out that the southwestern U.S. looks very much like Australia did before its nine-year drought. The so-called Australian Millennium Drought did have one benefit: it got people’s attention, including in America. Australian citizens and the government responded to these extremes with a wide range of technical, economic, regulatory and educational policies. Urban water managers in Australia were forced to put in place aggressive strategies to curb water use and to expand sources of new and unconventional supplies.  Water rationing became the norm. The government subsidized efficient appliances and fixtures such as dual-flush toilets, and launched public educational campaigns to save water. Between 2002 and 2008 per capita urban water use—already low compared with the western U.S.—declined by 37 percent. Other efforts have focused on tapping unconventional supplies, such as systems that reuse gray water, cisterns to harvest rooftop runoff, and sewage treatment and reuse. The country’s five largest cities are spending $13.2 billion to double the capacity of desalination, enough to meet 30 percent of current urban water needs. The Australian government announced more than $6 billion in aid to improve irrigation infrastructure and make it more productive.

America can, and indeed, must adopt similar changes of attitude and performance. There is nothing to prevent the U.S. and its citizens from following Australia’s example except inadequate will power and a willingness to endure some inconveniences and even minor privations in order to ensure our future. At least in the West, we may live to see the near disappearance of green lawns, summer car washing, and the appearance of different toilets, water meters that shut off supply once a specific maximum day’s usage is exceeded. Water rationing will be the order of the day and a routine part of living in the American West. Water wasters will feel the heavy hand of government including pricing systems that charge heavy water users more per gallon. We will no longer be able to ignore scoff-laws.

The drought suffering region of the American West looks at a future of growing population and shrinking supplies. Many cities are trying to adapt, and many are facing realities of austerity. A brief description of water policies indicates a growing success in conservation.

•Education, like Denver’s Water Campaign, with humorous billboards to catch the public’s attention and voluntary cooperation.

•New law enforcement divisions to police water use—a water patrol with full enforcement capabilities. This includes the enforcement of laws prohibiting such things as ornamental fountains unless they recirculate water. Dumping of toxins into water supplies on purpose should be regarded as a felony with very severe punishment attached. Accidental dumping must be controlled by the exacting of serious fines as an educational inducement for better management.

•Require industries such as nuclear power plants to use only reclaimed waste water from their inception and to refit their systems if already established.

•Improved water use equipment—free water conservation hose nozzles, dual flush and low water capacity toilets. Some cities require replacement of all toilets installed before 1993, and subsidize or provide new and better toilets for free to encourage cooperation. Water efficient washing machines are available, and citizens could be rewarded for switching to them. Educate the public  and provide rainwater harvesting equipment on a mandatory basis.

•Be willing to bear the cost of maintaining water systems, including pumps, pipes, and connections to avoid leaks. Maintain very strict scrutiny of dams to ensure no leaking and no disruptions of the dams’ integrity.

•Action regarding reports of violators—including rewards to neighbors calling the drought police.

•Reclaiming reservoirs.

•Reusing grey and sewage water which requires larger and improved water-purification plants. This should include reinjection of purified (and usually pharmaceutical-free) water back into aquifers.

•New pipelines from water-rich to water-poor areas.

•Limitations in migration to already over-populated (water-wise) areas such as Las Vegas by increased taxation and fees on new building.

•Requirements for reuse of water in hotels and golf courses. Las Vegas has had considerable success in passing and enforcing strict regulations. The entire Las Vegas Strip uses only three percent of its water resources.

•Statutory limitations on high water use recreation facilities. Preparing an 18-hole golf course for four golfers to play a single round requires as much water as a typical American family uses in a month.

•Statutory limitations on the total amount of lawn grass permitted around residences and recreational areas. This must include both new construction and old established sites—no grandfathering. Some cities reward citizens to substitute xeriscapes and artificial turf for lawn.

•Mandatory rules tying allowable growth directly to the amount of water available for the specific project including individual family homes.

•Building, and where necessary, subsidizing desalinization plants where there is access to salt water.

•Institute strict rainwater preservation measures through the populated areas—residential, industrial, and recreational areas.

•Institute major forest fire prevention measures such as controlled burns and forest thinning to protect reservoirs. Fires dump ash and toxins like arsenic into and ruin reservoirs.

•In cities with heavy storm runoff into oceans and lakes, cities need to install water filtration/purification facilities to collect the water and to make certain that our oceans, lakes, and reservoirs are no longer polluted with the toxins that wash into them at present. Los Angeles is considering such a system on a major basis.

•Learn from successful cities such as Las Vegas and Phoenix, Arizona. Despite a 15 percent population growth rate in Phoenix over the last fourteen years and a population of 1.3 million, per capita water use has gone down. One important facet of improvement in those cities has been the use of rebates and cash incentives to the public to improve their water use.

The desert peoples of the Middle-East who are oil-rich and water-poor have long known that water is more precious than petroleum. Life depends on water. It is self-evident that the above described measures will be costly, but the benefit versus cost and risk ratio is solidly in favor of water conservation and efficiency. We, The People of the United States, will accept the inconveniences and cost, or our economy in the West will gradually fail. What we have been doing is unsustainable. Too many people live in the deserts. Too many people are moving there. And there is too little water for even a reduced population. It is time posthumous to do something.

Posted in Featured | Leave a comment
•In 634 BCE, Many Romans feared that the city would be destroyed in the 120th year of its founding. There was a myth that 12 eagles had revealed to Romulus a mystical number representing the lifetime of Rome, and some early Romans hypothesized that each eagle represented 10 years.
•In 66-70 CE, the Essene sect of Jewish ascetics saw the Jewish revolt against the Romans as the final end-time battle. By the authority of Simon, coins were minted declaring the redemption of Zion.
•On April 6, 93 CE, the Spanish monk, Beatus of Liébana, prophesied the second coming of Christ and the end of the world on that day to a crowd of people.
•Sextus Julius Africanus revised the date of Doomsday to 800.
•In 848 CE, Thiota declared that the world would end that year.
•Christian clerics predicted the end of the world on date the date of the Millennium—January 1, 1000, including Pope Sylvester II. Believers sat on their rooftops waiting for the Rapture. Riots occurred in Europe. Pilgrims headed east to Jerusalem.
•Following the failure of the January 1, 1000 prediction, some theorists proposed that the end would occur 1000 years after Jesus’ death—1033 CE, instead of his birth. People sat on their rooftops waiting for the Rapture.

•A group of astrologers in London predicted the world would end by a flood starting in London on February 1, 1524 based on calculations made the previous June. 20,000 Londoners left their homes and headed for higher ground in anticipation. Many sat on their rooftops waiting for the Rapture, as well.
•The same astrologers who predicted the deluge of February 1, 1524 recalculated the date to February 1, 1624 after their first prophecy failed. People sat on their rooftops waiting for the Rapture
•In his Book of Prophecies (1501), Columbus predicted that the world would end in 1656. Some followers sat on their rooftops waiting for the Rapture.
•When the world did not end in 1656, Columbus revised his calculations and claimed that the world was created in 5343 BCE, and would last 7000 years. Assuming no year zero, that meant that the end would come in 1658. Fewer followers sat on their rooftops waiting for the Rapture.
•Puritan minister, Cotton Mather, predicted the world would end in 1697. After the prediction failed, he revised the date of the End two more times. Each time, many believers sat on their rooftops and waited for the Rapture.
•Cotton Mather revised his prediction after his 1697 prediction failed to come true. A group of followers sat on their rooftops in 1716 and waited for the Rapture.
•Mather revised his prediction after neither his 1697 nor his 1716 predictions came to pass. Only a handful of true believers sat on their rooftops in 1736 and waited for the Rapture.
•After Christ did not return on March 21, 1844, the Millerites then revised William Miller‘s prediction to October 22, 1844, claiming to have miscalculated scripture. Each time, believing Millerites sat on their rooftops and waited for the Rapture. The realization that the predictions were incorrect resulted in the Great Disappointment.
•The founder of the Ghost Dance movement, Wovoka, predicted in 1889 that the Millennium would occur in 1890. The Indian people did not have many rooftops to sit on waiting for the Rapture, but they did so in spirit.
•According to Margaret Rowan, a Seventh-day Adventist leader, the angel Gabriel appeared before her in a vision and told her that the world would end at midnight on this February 13, 1925. Believers sat on their rooftops and waited for the Rapture.
•The 2nd Prophet of the Branch Davidians, Florence Houteff, predicted the apocalypse foretold in the Book of Revelation would proceed on April 22, 1959. Believers sat on their rooftops and waited for the Rapture. The failure of the prophecy led to the split of the sect.
•Jim Jones, the founder of the Peoples Temple, stated he had visions that a nuclear holocaust was to take place in 1967.
•In 1972, Herbert W. Armstrong made yet another prediction of the End of the World, his third. The first two were in 1936 and 1943. failed to come true. People sat on their rooftops and waited for the Rapture. Nevertheless the third prediction failed to come true

 

Posted in Featured, Mini-synopses of books by Carl Douglass | Leave a comment

On average, the ten driest states in the union are, in order of driest to wettest: Nevada (9.5 inches a year), Utah, Wyoming, Arizona, New Mexico, Montana, Colorado, North Dakota, Idaho, and South Dakota. During the summer crop growing months, the order is: California (.25 inch per month), Nevada, and Utah with Washington coming in 6th, and the rest listed falling about as for the year-long average. Evidence is accumulating that the American West is in for a prolonged and worsening drought—a megadrought–as some experts dub it. Easterners, mid-westerners, and the confederate states are likely unaware of the magnitude and the duration of the western drought or of the impact that the western drought will have on them. During the December, 2013, American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting In San Francisco, those experts reported following a drought present since 2000—13 years, and counting—and are on record that the likelihood is high that this century could see a multi-decade dry spell like nothing else seen over the past 1,000 years. The portion of the long-term drought that hit western North America from 2000 to 2004 was the most severe drought in 800 years. During these years, the region’s precipitation averaged as much as 22–25% below the 20th-century mean, with local deficits being greater. One paleoclimatologist states flatly that, “There’s no indication it’ll be getting any better in the near term.”

                According to Bobby Magill, writing in Climate Central’s Science Journalists and Content Partners, “Since 2000, the West has seen landscape-level changes to its forests as giant wildfires have swept through the Rockies and the Sierra Nevada; bark beetles have altered the ecology of forests by killing countless trees; and western cities have begun to come to terms with water shortages made worse by these changes as future snowpack and rainfall becomes less and less certain in a changing climate.” Farming and recreational industries–which depend on snow and the life giving water it yields–are especially severely impacted now and it is not an exaggeration to extrapolate from history that such droughts have the potential to be threats to civilization in the future.

                Megadroughts—defined as a drought that lasts in excess of twenty years—are not new, nor is the evidence conclusive that this one or any other in the past is related primarily to human causes. Natural variability has always had a tremendous impact on the climate system. Analysts recorded that California endured one of its longest droughts ever observed, from late 1986 through early 1991.  Data from tree rings tell us that the West that was affected by a severe drought in the Medieval period was much worse and much longer than the current drought. Similar date reveal droughts that have lasted 28 and 29 years in separate occurrences, and two especially severe droughts lasted 100 and 200 years each in the Sierra Nevada range of what is now California. Some of those droughts have spanned the entire area occupied by what is now the United States.

                What is the impact on the West already, and what need we fear for the future? The current drought is obviously related to sweeping and abrupt changes in the nation’s forests.  Bark beetles are spreading more widely, living longer, and breeding more successfully during the prolonged hot dry periods and that is proving to be catastrophic to our coniferous forests. The ecosystems which support the magnificent population of mammals indigenous to the West are being eroded and destroyed. Such dry spells have severe implications for the nation’s water supply, and we are already seeing that in the decline in our agricultural water. The Colorado River no longer flows to the sea in Tijuana, Mexico, in most years; and legal battles rage among western states over the amount of that river’s water they can extract. The river’s flow at Lee’s Ferry in Utah has declined by 50%.  Water levels in major reservoirs such as Lake Powell have steadily declined over the past decade; many water analysts project that the largest may never refill. River basins in several areas have dried up, resulting in an ever expanding area of desertification–leaving a wasteland. Water rationing in the arid counties of California has already been initiated and will likely go to the extreme of prohibition of agricultural watering all together in order to provide adequate culinary water.  During this drought, scientists say, carbon sequestration in the arid  regions was reduced by half.  That results in a net increase in global carbon emissions. If that condition—the death rate of carbon sequestering plants–does not improve, the future will be even worse.

                The financial impact is becoming severe as well. Many farmers and ranchers are simply giving up—reminiscent of the dust bowl conditions of the 1930s. Meeting domestic demands through transference from agriculture presents concerns for rural sustainability and food security. Economic losses exceeded $40 Billion in the droughts of 1980 and 1988, and the combination of drought and heat-related deaths totaled more than 5000 in each event. The drought of 2000 resulted in losses of $4 Billion and 140 deaths. According to the USDA, the 2012 drought destroyed or damaged portions of the major field crops in the Midwest, particularly field corn and soybeans. This led to increases in the farm prices of corn, soybeans, and other field crops and, in turn, led to price increases for other inputs in the food supply such as animal feed. As of April 2013, drought has persisted across approximately two-thirds of the United States and is threatening agricultural production and other sectors. “More than 1,180 counties so far have been designated as disaster areas for the 2013 crop season, including 286 counties contiguous to primary drought counties,” The Congressional Research Service reports. The total cost of the current drought thus far is estimated to be between $50 billion to $80 billion.

                In 2013, California experienced its driest year on record, and the state’s current snowpack is just 17 percent of average. 2013 saw third-driest January and February in Sacramento in 150 years, and the driest in California since 1920, when statewide record-keeping began. As a result of the prolonged drought, Californians face dead brown lawns, bucket showers, rationing of toilet flushing, overuse and depletion of ground water, idle ski lifts, crop failures, death of stock animals, dry-wells going empty for years, a significant and possibly a mass out-migration, and more frequent and more severe forest fires. More than one-third of interviewed ranchers expect devastating impacts to their operations if drought conditions persist as they will in all likelihood. All California counties are currently designated agricultural disasters by the United States Department of Agriculture. The governor of California has declared a state of emergency covering the entire state.

                Water demand in Texas is expected to rise 22 percent by 2060, according to the state’s Water Development Board, and the state is instituting stringent measures to insure that the increased population has enough to drink and enough to maintain conservative use in industry. They consider that this drought will cost the state $116 billion.

                This persistent drought appears to be a fact of life for the United States, especially for the people who live in the West. What, if anything, can we do about it? The next blog post will discuss strategies, costs, and austerities.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Health, Wellness | Leave a comment

Violence against womenand girls is a hate crime because violent acts are primarily or exclusively committed against women. This violence is gender-based–acts of violence are committed against women expressly because they are women. The acts perpetrated by individuals–almost always by men and boys—include sexual assault, rape, domestic violence, FGM, kidnapping, honor killings, and other murders. Besides being a hate crime such violence is an obvious health issue and a violation of human rights.For the purposes of this narrowly defined opinion, the broad categories of psychological abuse and state or group based maltreatment–such as mob violence, sexual slavery, human trafficking, forced prostitution, feet binding, and instances of religious based condemnation and violence against victims of rape—will not be considered.

Statistics year in and year out indicate that  at least one in five women world-wideare physically or sexually abused by a man sometime in their lifetime. The violence occurs in all races, cultures, religions, ethnic groups, and socio-economic strata. Gender-based violence against women accounts for as much death and ill-health in females aged 15–44 years as cancer, and is a greater cause of ill-health than malaria and traffic accidents combined. More often than not, the violence is perpetrated by someone the woman knows, rather than a stranger. Marital violence is a major risk factor for serious injury and even death, and women in violent marriages are at much greater risk of being seriously injured or killed.

I have spent a considerable portion of my lifetime engaging in martial arts—boxing, wrestling, karate, judo, Jiu Jitsu, Aikido, and Krav Maga. I have a soft spot in my soul for women and girls and a sense of protectiveness towards them. Women and girls should not be mistreated. Period. For that reason, I have concentrated my martial arts activities in my later years on teaching self-defense to women. Almost entirely, it is men who hurt women; so, I will only teach women and girls. Let me be clear about my philosophy: Personal defense means that the girl can protect herself against an assailant and can use whatever measures necessary to be able to go home intact. Such defense includes skill in martial arts, use of weaponry, screaming, yelling, kicking, hitting, and getting the attention of law enforcement and decent bystanders. I make no bones about it; it is better to answer to critics after having survived an attack than to be a sweet, nice, obedient victim. If he brings a fist, she brings fists, elbows, knees, feet, head butts, pressure holds, pepper spray, and a taser. If he brings a knife, she brings a gun. That is to say, do what is necessary to go home in one piece. At the end of a violent encounter, it is the man—the attacker—who should be injured, maimed, or killed. It is the attacker who should have to deal with the police or to bear the shame and humiliation of having committed a crime, not the girl.

Here are the rules I try to inculcate into the psyches of my students:

  1. Learn to avoid dangerous places, not to wear provocative clothing, not to enter the company of people you do not know, avoid intoxicating substances, taking chances on the wild side—no infatuation with “bad boys”.
  2. Learn how, when in a bad situation, how to negotiate, to plead, to gain sympathy, to threaten.
  3. Learn to scream, to run faster and farther than the attacker, to get the attention of potential protectors, report to police officers, parents, and friends about suspicious or actual perpetrators. Do what is necessary to be able to flee or to fight.
  4. Learn to fight. Keep it simple: learn where and how to kick, hit, gouge, bite, and injure joints, eyes, muscles, fingers and toes, and any vulnerable parts. Learn not to be a victim, not to freeze up, not to give up. Never make a half-hearted self-defense effort designed to suggest to the attacker that you might not like what he is doing. If you need to fight, do it all out. Poke an eye to blind, break fingers, smash teeth and nose, render the attacker helpless and unable to continue. It is work and takes years of training to know how to protect yourself. Start now.
  5. Never under any circumstances allow yourself to be forced into a vehicle or into a secluded place by a perp. It is better to fight to the death in plain sight and with the possibility of witnesses than to be taken. Many women and children have saved themselves by becoming a wolverine when accosted. Such an encounter is no time for daintiness or prissiness. It is not a time for analysis or contemplation. Learn to act suddenly and ferociously.
  6. Be brave. If you are in an abusive relationship, go to the police or just get out before it is too late. If you observe such abuse, be brave and report it before disaster occurs. No girl or woman should have to endure a rotten life. There are people and agencies that care and will provide help. Be smart about it.

Posted in Featured | Leave a comment

Ordinary intelligent and informed Americans and experts disagree about whether, how, or why the United States lost the very well intentioned “War on Poverty”. In 1964, Democratic President Lyndon B. Johnson declared war on poverty and created a much heralded act of law to defeat that scourge on the American economy. Fifty years have elapsed since the act was passed. The poverty rate in 1964 was nineteen percent. We have spent twenty trillion dollars to eradicate poverty, and today (2014) the poverty rate is fifteen percent. Many people—including economists and sociologists–from the left and right agree that the war on poverty has been a failure.

                There is very little agreement as to why that gargantuan effort failed: the government did not do enough; the government did not do the right kind of things; there was inadequate education; a population of “pets”—multigenerational dependents—was established; capitalism and the market place were not allowed to prevail; and the very assumptions about causes of poverty were wrong. The conservatives insist that the government does not know how to influence the personal choices people make, but the unrestricted capitalistic market place does.

                Almost no one disagrees with the concepts that lack of education and resulting failure to obtain meaningful and economically sustaining work, to build strong families, and to get up and out of poverty ridden ghettos—both urban and rural—lie at the core of the problem of poverty. There is nearly universal disagreement about how to deal with the issues. Keynesians demand that more money and help be poured into the lives of the poor—provide them with decent housing, transportation, and health care. Far right wing conservatives say it is time to make the moochers go out on their own–“I did it, and so can they.” Johnson focused on education—too much, his after-the-fact critics say. The critics would concentrate on creating jobs—meaningful jobs. Poverty is caused by unemployment. The government and private enterprise must provide jobs that provide livable incomes.Somehow.

                So, what about jobs? Employers complain that the U.S. workforce is not well enough educated and trained and is unable to keep up with foreign nations with their industrious commitment to serious education. On the other hand, one professor of economics asserts that “…unemployment is caused by the economic system, not the shortcomings of workers.” There is good reason to believe that. Seven people seeking jobs apply for every job available, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The disheartening fact is that only one of those applicants will get the job. There are simply not enough jobs available for people who are willing and able to work. Many of the jobs do not provide benefits such as retirement pensions or health care, or even a full work-week.

Generating a demand for labor has proved to be ephemeral. New-Deal type of federal jobs have been tried during the past three years without the effective creation of new, long-lasting, good paying jobs. That is despite the fact that there is a crying need for work to be done by cities, counties, states, and at the federal level. The American Society of Civil Engineers, for example, has recently estimated that—right now–we need $3.6 trillion in improvements to the U.S. physical infrastructure—building and maintaining roads, building more and better hospitals, schools, parks, sewer and water systems, etc. Factories work below capacity; so the obvious answer is to put more workers in place. Somehow. The questions about how are huge. Should governments pay the wages? Should taxes be radically lowered to provide incentives? Should the minimum wage be raised to the point that lower socioeconomic families can have a decent life? Should the government do the simplest of all things—print more money

The downside of each of those solutions is fairly obvious. If the government pays the wages, taxes have to rise and real income of the people who work to fall. If taxes are radically lowered, the government will not be able to pay its staggering debts—such as the interest on the national debt. If the payroll tax of 6.2% were abolished, everyone would get a 6.2% raise. However, the government cannot function without funding—that might well prove to be something of a problem. If the minimum wage is raised to the level that provides a decent life, companies will simply close their doors, unemployment will rise, and the cycle of poverty will take another downward spiral.

Mind you, there are those who do not see the war on poverty as a failure. The very definition of poverty is a minimal wage level for a family of four. The supporters of the war on poverty point out that both earned income and government assistance should be factors. Such things as food stamps, unemployment insurance, Medicaid, housing support, and health care benefits, if added in, would reduce the poverty rate to somewhere closer to eleven percent. Even the most ardent political conservative would be likely to admit that many individuals and families benefit from such programs as WICK, Head-start, Social Security, Medicare, Job Corps, CHIP, and Child Tax Credit programs. Even the most ardent left-wing political progressive recognizes that none of these programs singularly or in concert have taken enough families out of the poverty cycle long term. Anyone who digs deep enough has to admit that the libertarians have recognized real problems in government sponsored help. There are both philosophical and empirical problems in pursuing that set of solutions. The government has been funding multiple generations of people to remain poor and unproductive. They can earn more from welfare than they can be getting jobs. Massive amounts of money has been spent on the poor, and far too many comfortable middle-class bureaucrats siphon off the taxpayers’ contributions without making a definite or lasting change in the poverty-class of the country. As a result of such opinions and due to a decreasing tax base since 2008, fewer children in poverty get three squares a day, have decent shoes,  are provided with day-care so their parents can do minimum wage work; and there is growing despair and sense of hopelessness for them and their families. As one homeless boy said, “You ain’tnuthin’ if you don’t have a home.”

Do I know the answer? No. Am I impressed that the experts—on either side of the question—do? No. Should we just give up and turn a blind eye to the problems and hope for some sort of divine intervention? No. As an American taxpayer, I am open to suggestion.

Posted in Featured | Leave a comment