Having discussed the new and interesting procedures being used or studied by neurosurgeons, it is time to throw a wet blanket on some of that. Evidence-based-medicine (EBM) is valuable and a stringent measure of what is effective, what is safe, and what is not. Insurance companies determine whether or not they will approve of or pay for procedures largely based on the evidence available. When there are large, carefully done studies—and especially a lot of them—regarding a treatment, EBM is a valid determinate of whether or not a doctor and/or a patient should chose the well-studied procedure or not. Let me add parenthetically that EBM is far more accurate than TV advertising or your aunt Minnie’s anecdotal experience. However, EBM has a limitation. Procedures that are well established but not recently studied; studies that have only small numbers of patients because only a few surgeons know how to do the operation; and studies that have only small numbers of patients because the disease condition is infrequent or rare, may not have and may never have sufficient data to rank them as EBM verified as effective and safe.

That having been said, I submit to you Aetna Insurance Company’s considerations—taken from their website and contributions to discussions on effectiveness of procedures discussed elsewhere. Aetna considers a wide-range of procedures to be “experimental and investigational” and therefore their effectiveness has not been established and will not be covered by insurance. This may prove difficult for the patient. The following are examples of procedures so designated: Continue reading

Posted in Medical Breakthroughs | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The previous blog dealt mainly with neurosurgical us of stimulation devices—Deep Brain Stimulation and spinal cord stimulation for a variety of nervous system problem. This blog will deal mainly with minimalized ablative surgery, i.e. removal or destruction of tissue. Prior to the advent of techniques utilizing operative microscopy, radio frequency lesioning, and MRI guided surgery, open procedures were done for a variety of neurosurgical and psychiatric problems. Intractable seizures were treated with open removal of brain tissue—often involving the temporal lobe and sometimes having the patient be awake to test efficacy. Direct lesions were made in the thalamus; prefrontal lobotomies and cingulumotomies were done for intractable psychiatric conditions. Seizure surgery still requires an open procedure in some cases, but usually, the surgical intervention is much less invasive. Brain tumor procedures have improved by the use of small cranial openings and MRI imaging as an adjunct.

The stimulating operations for Parkinsonism and pain described in the previous blog have a counterpart in ablative surgery. The procedures are very similar except that the hardware is almost always removed once the final tissue removal or destruction is completed. MRI guided surgery is used for DBS and for focal laser ablation and for brain tissue biopsy. Visualization is markedly enhanced and surgery made safer utilizing the imaging technique. Continue reading

Posted in Medical Breakthroughs | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

William J. Bennett described three classes of people in a lecture to the United States Naval Academy on November 24, 1997. Bennett said, “Most of the people in our society are sheep. They are kind, gentle, productive creatures who can only hurt one another by accident or under extreme provocation—the regular people in society who go about their lives unaware of those who protect them or what they do. Then there are the wolves–the criminals, foreign enemies, and terrorists–and the wolves feed on the sheep without mercy. [Finally]…Then there are sheepdogs. I’m a sheepdog. I live to protect the flock and confront the wolf.”

Bennett told the midshipmen about a sign he saw in one California law enforcement agency, ‘We intimidate those who intimidate others’.

His attacker is dead, and Sheep Dog needs answers: who is after him and what is a woman assassin with a CIA Identification card hidden in her shoe doing in his grand Parisian hotel in the dark of night? Continue reading

Posted in Books By Carl Douglass, Featured | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Classical neurosurgery involved fairly large incisions, displacement and/or destruction of delicate tissues and some attendant adverse effects. For the past thirty+ years, neurosurgery—like other surgical disciplines has been striving to achieve minimization—smaller incisions, less invasive approaches, stimulation rather than removal of tissue, more use of magnified vision, imaging techniques such as MRI, and neurofunctional adjuncts such as interoperative EEG. In this blog, the author will attempt to acquaint readers with the new—and sometimes radically new—procedures. The descriptions will contain necessary sophisticated language for which there is little simple substitute. None of the descriptions will be in-depth or even approaching completeness due to lack of space. The disease processes and operative techniques will not be described at any length for the same reasons.

Great strides have been made in the treatment of previously intractable movement disorders. Decades of research and experience has resulted in the ability to place small electrodes in areas of a patient’s brain that control bodily movement. The electrodes are then attached to a sophisticated and long-lived battery buried under the skin, much like cardiac pacemakers. The implanted device sends electrical signals to the brain sites where the tips of the electrodes reside. With some trial-and-error experimentation, a frequency is established that provides optimal regulation of involuntary motor movement in patients such as those with Parkinson’s Disease, dystonia, essential tremor and sometimes in seizure disorders. The procedure is safe, effective, and almost painless. Determination of the exact point where the electrodes are to be placed is determined by MRI imaging, monitoring prolonged EEG studies, and intraoperative trials in awake patients to access whether or not stimulation of particular brain area ameliorates the abnormal movements or electrical activity. DBS is considered to be better than ablation (destruction of brain tissue) for Parkinson’s patients especially because it is adjustable and reversible. Continue reading

Posted in Health Care Reform, Medical Breakthroughs | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The most common of all headache types in the world is the tension headache. Around the world, between 80 to 90 percent of the population suffers from tension headaches at least some time in their lives. 88 percent of females and 69 percent of males experience tension headaches with the average age of first onset occurring between nine and twelve years of age.

Episodic tension headache occurs in more than 70% of most of the world’s populations, and chronic tension headaches affect between 1 and 3% of adults.

Tension headaches usually begin during adolescence, affecting three women to every two men. The mechanism of causation is often stress-related or associated with musculoskeletal problems in the neck such as over exercising, sitting at a computer, or minor injuries such as a mild whiplash. Continue reading

Posted in Featured | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Do you suffer from a chronic headache disorder?

Headaches constitute one of the most significant scourges of mankind. Anyone who says, “It’s just a headache,” is one of the rare individuals who has never had a severe headache and does not know anyone who does.

More people complain of headache than any other ailment—some 45 million Americans each year, over 16% of the population. 23% of households contain at least one migraine sufferer. At one time or another in their lives more than 90% of the U.S. population will experience some kind of headache. More than eight million Americans visit their doctor for complaints of headache each year. Headache is the seventh most common reason for outpatient visits in the country.

By definition, acute headaches are those that occur uncommonly, usually less than once a week. Episodic headaches appear occasionally–less than 15 times per month, and chronic headaches occur more than 15 times per month or on a consistent basis over longer stretches of time. Continue reading

Posted in Featured | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The terms, “fair” and “fairness” are defined by conservatives and Republicans on the one hand, and liberals and Democrats on the other hand so differently that the distance between the two definitions is interplanetary. The disparity between the two definitions and the policies provoked by them is far from esoteric; the nation’s immigration policies, establishment of state and federal budgets, treatment of the indigent, management of welfare programs, use of taxes, racial relations, healthcare delivery, and the extent of public services are all held hostage by the gridlock engendered by the entrenched conviction that one side or the other holds the only true definition of what is fair.

For the record: the definition “fair” put forth by Webster’s New Universal Unabridged Dictionary (Fully Revised and Updated) is lengthy but pertinent to this discussion:

-“free from bias, dishonesty, or injustice; honest, just, impartial, unprejudiced, straight-forward, providing equitable opportunity—a fair decision, a fair judge.
-legitimately sought, pursued, done, given; proper under the rules—a fair fight,
-moderately large, ample—a fair income.
-neither excellent or poor; moderately or tolerably good—fair health.
-marked by favoring conditions, likely, promising—a fair way to succeed.
-in a fair manner, disinterested, impartial, unbiased, treating all sides with the same equity and
justice with no intent or desire to favor or fault one side over the other, avoiding a selfish advantage for one side or the other—to play fair, a fair compromise.
-the policy and practice of choosing people for employment, housing, distribution or withhold-
ing of benefit, or determination of judgment based on objective evidence, capabilities, compliance with a set standard and not on the basis of race, creed, religion, color, national origin, ethnicity, [included by CD–gender, age, or sexual orientation]. Continue reading

Posted in Featured | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

THE LAST PHOENIX, a Story of the CIA’s Phoenix Program during the Vietnam War, A Novel of Betrayal and Revenge

THE LAST PHOENIX, by Carl Douglass, is an historical novel that exactly fits my interests. I am a military history buff, and I like the way the author has combined a wide perspective with a narrow one from the point of view of a single individual and his immediate companions, friends, and enemies. I was greatly helped by the table of contents, cast of characters, glossary, and short bibliography without which I would have found it difficult to keep track in this complex and highly interwoven book.

Karl Isaacson is large, raw-boned boy growing up in an obscure Utah town, not unlike most country boys in the United States as it stands on the brink of a war with an obscure little country in Southeast Asia called Viet Nam. Few people know where it is located, but everyone knows that by the domino theory, communism will topple country after country until it controls all of Asia, if not all of the world, and the evil empire has to be contained. None of that means anything to Karl. He has his own problems trying to get along in a town that is hostile towards him because he does not belong to the dominant religion or the dominant ethnic background. He is a young Swede in a mean-spirited Danish settlement.

Karl is an orphan, and he has an unruly temper. Both of those qualities conspire to get him into trouble, and trouble gets him engineered into the army rather than into jail. He is underage—sixteen—but it is not too difficult to make a few alterations, and his documents put him at eighteen. The army accepts him, and he flourishes in boot camp. One day, a recruiting agent from the CIA determines that Karl is perfect for the agency’s purposes—fit, strong, patriotic, unexposed to un-American ideas, and most of all, has no family ties. He is expendable.

He is taken for extensive training in all of the arts of survival and killing at The Farm—the CIA’s training site for clandestine officers. He is tested by participating in an operation against a South American communist family, and passes altogether acceptably. He is given a new identity—that of Anders Bergstrom, a representative of the Swedish Red Cross–and flown to Saigon. There he is assigned to the Riverine Patrol where he becomes a warrior in every sense of the term and becomes ready for his CIA career as a Provincial Reconnaissance Unit Cadre Officer [PRUC/O] and begins operations to interdict, arrest, kidnap, turn, torture, or kill Viet Cong—whatever is necessary to weaken and finally to defeat the indigenous South Vietnamese insurgency. Every day is a risk and a fight for Anders and the members of his PR unit.

Members of the unit come from all walks of Vietnamese life. Some refuse to cooperate with the Americans just as they did with the French. Their fate is to die or to be transported to Con Son Island prison—the most brutal and pestilential penal establishment in the history of the world. Those who see the light and become ralliers [turncoats] and willingly join the ranks of the PRUC, are repatriated into South Vietnamese life. The permanence of that decision is punctuated by them having a tattoo over each breast which says, “kill cong” and another tattoo on the back in the form of a phung hoang [Vietnamese style phoenix bird, in this case one holding a computer paper scroll in its beak with the list of Viet Cong who are being hunted down relentlessly]. Because none of the men can trust anyone outside their unit, the Americans and Vietnamese cadres bond to each other as only men in combat do.

Because the nation—both nations—are corrupt, the men magnify their trust to smuggle heroin for drug generals living in the Golden Triangle, and they become rich during the ten years they fight and die for each other, as opposed to fighting for their countries. Anders has friends now as he never did before. Their names are: Y’Yool, a Montagnard; Nguyen Lui Tran, former VCI; Phan Duy Ky, a member of the Bui Doi—children of the dust, street orphans, most of whom are career criminals; Sergeant Le Duc Bach, former Kit Carson scout; and Nguyen Van Dung, former NVA sapper. Together they patrol, engage in skirmishes, arrest and interrogate suspects, and frequently their mission is to kill VCI members and supporters. After the Tet Offensive of 1968, very few Viet Cong are left, and in the joint military and PRUC mopping-up efforts, the VC is almost entirely devoid of power. The NVA is not ready to launch an invasion from the north, and the war can be considered to have been won by the Americans and those few true South Vietnamese Army patriots who actually engage in the struggle. However, American public opinion turns violently against the War in Viet Nam, and that social and political force is able to wrench defeat from the jaws of victory.

The waning months of the war place the PRUCs in a deadly crossfire. They remain survivors, essentially living off the land and carrying out near suicidal missions, depending only on themselves. They are not acknowledged by America and are obliged to find their own way out after that fateful day, April 30, 1975 when America turns tail, and betrays the CIA field operatives and their families to the mercies of the invading North Vietnamese Army. The PRUCs of Anders’s unit have made themselves rich and to have the resources to seek revenge. That revenge is terrible and is carried even to America. Some of the primary agents of the carnage of that misbegotten war finally see justice.

The book is long, complex, and rich with details of military battles, assassinations, loves, family life, intrigue, geography, tradition, and history. Certainly all of that is too much to include in this short synopsis. The story is something of an allegory in which a boy and his country go to war to right wrongs, to preserve freedoms, and to save lives; and they fail at every goal. Both the boy and the country descend into a heart of darkness where all that is left is national disgrace, the gall of bitterness, shame and maltreatment of the boys and the country who went there in all good faith and lost their innocence—to say nothing of the devastation and near annihilation of the innocents in country.

Purchase your copy of “The Last Phoenix” here”.

-Karl L. Nielson
Director, Fennemore Craig Jones Vargas
Former President, Clark County
Bar Association

-Kristina Shimazaki, Polyglot linguist trained at La Intitut Le Manoir, La Neuveville, Switzerland. She holds a diplomate in the French language from the Universite’ of Neuchâtel, Switzerland

Posted in Books By Carl Douglass | Tagged , | Leave a comment

ALL IN JEST, by Carl Douglass, is my favorite book of all of his novels, and, in fact of all the fiction books I have read. Sybil Norcroft, M.D., PhD, F.A.C.S. is a brilliant and highly accomplished woman in a man’s field. She is nearing the pinnacle of success in her specialty of neurosurgery and has benefitted her patients, her hospital, and her community greatly. She is not called the “Snow Queen” for nothing; the woman seems to have ice water in her veins instead of blood, is something of a femanazi; and not everyone is altogether fond of her or applauds her successes.

As the novel opens, Dr. Norcroft is embroiled in a serious malpractice lawsuit stemming from a death of the scion of a very rich and prominent family which travels in the same rarefied atmosphere as Sybil and her husband, Charles Daniels. The young man was a nurse at Joseph Noble Hospital where Sybil works, and he died during a pituitary tumor operation she performed using a novel approach through the nose to the base of the skull. He bled to death, and the cause of that is not altogether certain. The foremost transsphenoidal surgeon in the world, a professor from Canada, is the star witness against Dr. Norcroft. The neurosurgeon defendant steels herself to hear the famous surgeon’s description that could possibly spell the end of her rising career.

Brendan McNeely, R.N. seeks Dr. Norcroft’s help because of a discharge of milk from his nipples indicative of an active pituitary tumor. There is nothing else unusual about him; and Sybil does a quick routine physical, laboratory, and radiological examination to verify the presence of the small but potent tumor. For his convenience, she moves the process quickly along and schedules him for the routine surgical procedure the following day. She had previously antagonized the head OR nurse and the hospital’s foremost ENT specialist—the nurse for Sybil’s political activism on behalf of feminist women, and the doctor because she refuses to have him be a paid assistant in the surgery. A nurse would be a fine assistant, she insists to the pushy ENT specialist.

The operation proceeds in a nearly bloodless approach, and the floor of the pituitary gland is removed in a few minutes. A magnified television view records the operative steps with high definition clarity. A small incision in the dural covering of the pituitary goes without incident; but when it is extended, a Krakatoa-like eruption of bleeding begins and despite all efforts becomes unstoppable. The aggrieved ENT specialist comes in to help and is greeted with gratitude. It is all to no avail, and Brendan McNeely dies. It is not long until Paul Bel Geddes, a malpractice attorney with a reputation of aggressive pursuit of his clients’ rights, files a malpractice suit, Sybil’s first.

The discovery period of the case is prolonged, rancorous, and full of grossly inappropriate behavior on the part of the attorney for the plaintiff, and is generally inconvenient and obnoxious for Sybil. However, the time for the actual trial is overly long and moves with glacial celerity. But the dreaded day does come, at last.

The courtroom scintillates with the verbal and evidentiary sparring between the attorneys, the witnesses—including the OR nurse and the ENT specialist– and Dr. Norcroft. Her attorney is every bit the match for Mr. Bel Geddes, and the fight becomes one involving the taking of no prisoners.

After it is over, Dr. Norcroft is treated with frank disrespect by the nurse who presented condemning evidence against her; and, unfortunately for both, the two of them have to cross paths several times a day. That disrespect and disharmony becomes of little consequence as a series of malpractice suits stream in from Paul Bel Geddes.

There is a suit for a patient Sybil sees briefly for leg pain and swelling caused by blood clots. Sybil makes the diagnosis and declares that it is not a neurosurgical problem. The patient dies of a pulmonary embolism. The next suit grows out of an incident in the hospital’s emergency room. A young man is seriously injured in a car crash and has a large hemorrhage in his chest. He is mentally foggy from his low blood pressure, but otherwise neurologically intact indicating that he does not have a blood clot in his head. Sybil gives an okay to proceed without further involvement of neurosurgery, and the ER doctors and the trauma surgeons take him up to the operating room. He dies of his massive injuries. Another suit comes from a man who is operated upon for a ruptured disc in his back, and again for another ruptured disc at a lower level on the opposite side. He claims that his back pain never got better and that it is wrong for him not to receive complete disability and to be able to quit work, and most importantly that Sybil had operated at the wrong level, on the wrong side, and had failed to remove the offending disc. One more suit comes because Sybil evaluates a Mexican woman who suffers a temporary stroke after being attacked by purse snatcher. The woman improves then appeares to deteriorate; there is ample evidence that she is malingering. An arteriogram is performed which is unremarkable.

The cases have several things in common: all of the patients appear to be exaggerating or malingering; they all have Paul Bel Geddes as their lawyer; and they are all conducted in a wearying war of attrition against Sybil Norcroft. All depositions are scenes of farce and gross disrespect; and they all seem to be interminable.

Instead of letting her fall into despair, Sybil’s husband buys her a run-down old ranch as a birthday present. She is able to make it into her sanity saving project. A group of Mexican migrant workers who are driven from the neighboring ranch by a nasty owner after not paying them a month’s wages, come forlornly by her place. They take to each other, and the Mexicans pitch in with enthusiasm to create a splendid Paso Fino horse ranch. In time, Sybil makes them her partners, and the ranch prospers. The Mexican families are devoted to Sybil, and they become less recipients of her largesse or even partners and become real friends. After multiple nasty encounters with Paul Bel Geddes, all of which make her, the Patrona, sad and depressed, she and her new friends hatch an ingenious plan to correct the injustice Sybil is experiencing.

That plan becomes a carefully crafted long term project. When it comes time to put it into motion, it is flawless. What finally happens is left for the reader to discover. It is the stuff of irony, hence the title of the book, ALL in JEST.

Purchase your copy of “All in Jest” here”.

-Kristina N. Shimazaki, B.A., Polyglot linguist
trained at La Intitut Le Manoir, La Neuveville,
Switzerland. She holds a diplomate in the
French language from the Universite’ of
Neuchâtel, Switzerland

Posted in Books By Carl Douglass | Tagged , | Leave a comment

THE VULTURE and THE PHOENIX, by Carl Douglass, is the last and the longest of the fascinating six book series: THE SAGA of a NEUROSURGEON. This book of fiction reads more like reality from a not too far distant past.

As I said in my synopsis of Book Four, ACADEMIA: THE LAW of the JUNGLE, I lived through this era as a neurosurgical resident, an academic, and a neurosurgeon and neuroopthalmologist in private practice. In Book Six, Garven Wilsonhulme is no longer a resident training, and now is a fully competitive academic neurosurgeon in a major (albeit fictional) University of California medical school. He now has power, and he wields it with an iron fist in a velvet glove. He is held in awe and esteem by the residents and in a place of equality with his fellow staff men. He has almost arrived, but there are mountain peaks he has yet to ascend; and this man with an unquenchable ego and ambition will not be satisfied until he sits atop the pinnacle of his profession.

It is a publish-or-perish world, and one which the lazy or the timid would do well to avoid. Garven is well up to the tasks presented by the arena of academia. He moves quickly to solidify his position by introducing a novel surgical treatment for spinal cord transection that proves to be somewhat successful, a feat never before accomplished in the treatment of traumatic paraplegia. Early in his academic career, he is offered an advancement from his rank of instructor to that of assistant professor, if he will continue his work at the University of California Osterlund Memorial Hospital [UCOMH]—a fictional place—instead of giving further consideration to the offers he receives from three other universities. It would be considered ungentlemanly to question the veracity of the information about those offers. Garven knows that perception is as important as reality—and it does not hurt to have had a couple of decades of practice playing poker with Apaches.

Elizabeth goes into labor with her second baby, and is treated shabbily by her obstetrician–Garven’s former chief of obstetrics during his internship. That relationship had been frosty, and Garven’s refusal to kowtow to the great man’s authority while his wife suffers rankled the man. The professor of obstetrics makes one remark too many and learns of Garven’s terrible temper. Elizabeth is thereafter treated well, but the professor carries a serious grudge that he will one day use against Garven with full vengeance. Garven, on his part, takes his usual incriminating notes on the professor’s behavior.

Garven’s legend grows with the passing years. He passes his specialty board examination with flying colors, and saves his residents when they get into trouble in surgery; he achieves important assignments on the committees that matter in the hospital, in the university, in the neurosurgery division, and in national organizations. He publishes journal articles that astound his colleagues and bring him fame and fortune. His is a star rises rapidly to the top. He makes enemies along the way, not the least of which are the anesthesiologist from the VA, the chief of obstetrics, and a new one—the neonatologist who takes umbrage when Garven does not punish his chief resident for defying the baby specialist with a Napoleonic complex.

He is now known as the “Jonas Salk of paraplegia” and uses his large account of grant money to devise a use for a finding he made  years before with his medical school mentor to develop a nearly innocuous surgical treatment for the universally fatal primary malignant tumor of the brain. He does not deem it necessary to give any credit to his first neurosurgical hero. He also does not make any effort to downplay the hyperbole of the press about his accomplishment.

He brings in friends to positions of authority on the neurosurgery staff and continues to curry favor with his former boss, Dr. Stark, all to solidify his position. He advances in academic rank from assistant to associate to full professor and is recognized as a comer in the UC system. He devises a previously unheard of fee-for-service plan to bring in more money to the university and to his fellow academicians thereby earning their admiration and gratitude. He befriends and treats the movers and the shakers of California and brings in a great deal of grant money. Garven Wilsonhulme, M.D., F.A.C.S is now one of the men with the Midas touch and the clinical following who is shaping the future of neurosurgery in California and the nation.

In 1967, Arthur Fletcher dies in compromising circumstances leaving his fortune to his only child, Elizabeth Fletcher Wilsonhulme , which makes her the richest woman in Arizona—and California, since that is where she now lives. Garven duly records the information about the circumstances of her father’s death but keeps it from her. His practice of deception expands to the use of his position on the National Institutes of Health (NIH)’s board of investigation for new drugs. He discovers a drug that an obscure non-MD researcher has worked on for years and can no longer afford to continue for lack of money. Garven turns down the man’s request and begins to work on a project of his own to develop the man’s useful drug. His secret efforts produce a drug that is an anti-tumor growth factor that not only works but brings Garven a patent, fame, and riches. He publishes multiple papers about separate elements of the drug and its effects, all of which contribute to the remarkably large and diverse bibliography of the boy from Cipher. In the minds of the public, Garven Wilsonhulme’s name becomes synonymous with the word “neurosurgery”. He achieves the chairmanship of the division of neurosurgery by devious means and gets it changed into a full department. The process takes a serious toll on his former supporters, and they will not forget his betrayal of them.

Garven uses his position to plagiarize yet another idea which joins his bibliography and cements his fame. He now makes more than half a million dollars a year and is asked to speak before every prominent medical group, on television talk shows, and before governmental policy committees. He becomes the president-elect of the foremost organization of neurosurgeons in the United States, and, indeed, the world. The Young Coyote is now the Old Man of Neurosurgery, a term of the greatest respect.

A career that meteoric is bound to plummet, and the career of Garven Wilsonhulme is no exception. His plagiarism is discovered as is his latest affaire de coeur, and his enemies within and without the university system beset him. His wife demands a divorce, but he counters in a myriad of cruel and effective ways. Finally, it all catches up with him, and he is forced to resign from his university and neurosurgical positions in ignominy.

However, he is still relatively young and not a forgiving sort. In the end, he gets not only a favorable divorce from Elizabeth, but also half of her money thus making him rich beyond his wildest boyhood imaginations. He tries his hand at corporate medicine and doubles his income and holdings. He exacts revenge.

Riches and vituperative power are his, and he uses them to their maximum. He then retires; but after marrying a thoroughly decent country woman, he begins to reassess his system of values and finds himself not only wanting but bored. He turns to his oldest friends, and together they find a solution to Garven’s problems and his life. That solution is a lesson in the achievement of true success.

I would betray Carl Douglass and his considerable effort if I were to divulge more. You will have to buy Book Six, THE VULTURE and THE PHOENIX, to learn more. And to get the full impact, get the rest of them. They are a treat and an education.

-Harvey Birsner, M.D., F.A.C.S.
Diplomate, American Board of Neurological Surgery
Fellow, North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society
Clinical Professor, Neurosurgery, Univ. of Texas,
Southwestern Medical School, Dallas
Associate Clinical Professor, Neurosurgery,
University of Southern California, Los Angeles

Purchase your copies of “The Young Coyote”, “Anything Goes”, “Heaven And Hell” ,”The Long Climb”, “Academia: The Law of the Jungle” and ‘The Vulture and the Phoenix” here”.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Mini-synopses of books by Carl Douglass | Tagged , , | Leave a comment