ACADEMIA: THE LAW of the JUNGLE, is the fifth and shortest of the series of books by Carl Douglass, a retired neurosurgeon of my vintage. I vividly remember stories like the ones told here by Dr. Douglass, for their humor, their sorrow, and especially for the level of gripping reality that this fine story teller evokes.

On the first day as a neurosurgical resident at the University of California Osterlund Memorial Hospital [UCOMH]–an entirely fictitious place–Garven Wilsonhulme meets the faculty and resident staff with whom he will eventually spend the five most tumultuous and life changing years of his career. He encounters their strong personalities, their intense opinions and competitiveness, and their mutual prejudices. Elizabeth, his wife, meets his contemporaries for the first time and finds them to be far too wild a bunch for her cultured tastes.

On his first day of actual work, he starts at “O-Dark 30” and still arrives later than the other residents, an indication of what the work and the competition is going to be like. The first three patients they see in the neuroICU are brain dead, and part of the daily work is to disconnect them from their life supports. Garven’s job that first 24 hour day is to get all of the ward scut work done and to learn everything there is to know about his patients. He barely closes his eyes that night when he receives a call to go down to The Pit—the infamous UCOMH emergency room.

“Boogie on down, Garven, we have a chance for you to excel down here,” says the Pit Boss.
That can only mean trouble, but bone-weary Garven, quickly goes to the ER. The good news is that there is a man who needs emergency brain surgery for a gunshot wound to the head. The bad news is that there were five more like him. Only four of them look like they will live long enough to be candidates for surgery, and Garven calls in the chief resident.
He takes note of Garven’s bloody scrubs and quips, “Looks like you’ve been celebrating the Black Sabbath, or you’ve had a busy night.” He rounds up two medical students and the four of them do three craniotomies at once. Garven gets squirted in the eye by opening the brain covering which contained a blood clot under tension, and got to meet the eye of a nursing student through a complete tunnel bored through one of the gang-bangers brain by a large caliber bullet. By the time he has done the three cases, he is well on his way to being a neurosurgeon in fact and not just by his title. He learns never to wear shorts or socks in the OR and how to make a satisfying clank of a bullet into a metal pan, which is the only way to deal with bullets removed from a human body. The fourth member of the Los Angeles Weekend Knife and Gun Club sustained only a severe scalp laceration from a glancing bullet, and Garven sutures it up quickly.

At four-thirty in the morning, the chief resident allows Garven to do his own craniotomy on a man with a hypertensive hemorrhage. He has to find his own medical student assistant. The operation proves to be a fool’s errand. The man bleeds to death because that is the nature of surgery on intracerebral hematomas, and Garven learns not to do another one in his career.

When he finally gets home the next night at eleven thirty, Elizabeth asks him, “Is this the way it’s always going to be, Garven?” Unfortunately, that is pretty much the case.
From each of the staff men, Garven learns significant aspects of elective surgery, but is seldom the one holding the knife on elective cases. His time is in the dead of night when citizens are asleep in their beds, and the cops and Garven form the firewall between them and the things that go bump in the night. On one Labor Day weekend when the chief resident has to be out of the hospital, Garven takes care of fourteen GSWs to the head, operates on eight of them, and of the total fourteen, eight die—four immediately, and four in the next two weeks. Neurosurgery is a very tough business, Garven decides.

Elizabeth has turned cold to Garven, and a student nurse turns hot and attempts to seduce him. She fails only because he gets called to the ER for a five alarm fire emergency before he can be unfaithful to his rich wife. She lingers in his mind, however. In the aftermath of that night of destruction by man versus man, Garven closes his day by making rounds in the NICU only to find that every patient is dead, and that the foreign-born nurses are blithely oblivious to that fact. Garven discovers that the reason is that the hospital’s electricity shut off just long enough to kill them all. Rounds the next morning are an unhappy test for the budding neurosurgeon. He was on call, and he was in charge. That is the rule.

His work load increases exponentially when the general surgery rotator is caught flagrante delicto with a student nurse. She is fired, and he finds work elsewhere. Garven finally succumbes to the nursing student’s blandishments, and as expected, the other residents and eventually, the staff find out about it, and Garven has to get rid of her. “I’m sorry, Tressie,” he says, “we can’t see each other anymore…” She asks if it is really necessary, and he tells her that it is—absolutely. He tells her, “I have killed myself to get this far. I can’t let anything jeopardize my career.”

“Or anyone?” she asks, already sure what the answer will be.
“Or anyone,” he says.

Things got better with Elizabeth for a three month period during his third year of residency when he is on a rotation to learn the nonsurgical aspects of his neurosurgical career. He learns a few things on his neurology rotation during that quarter such as never to do a lumbar puncture on a person suspected of having a mass pressing on his/her brain, and a fund of anti-neurosurgical jokes that his resident friends find hilarious when he returns to his real world on the neurosurgery service.

His stint on the VA neurosurgery service is notable because he runs afoul of the head of anesthesiology for the first time. Garven has a patient who needs an emergency subdural hematoma removed. The anesthesiologist refuses to leave the class he is teaching his residents, and Garven marches into the OR and does the operation—simple burr holes—under local anesthetic, thereby incurring the lasting enmity of the offended anesthesiologists. Just in case, Garven takes careful notes of the incident in case such information will become useful one day in the future. Garven is learning to protect number one.

A worse problem comes a month later when he has a similar run in with the chief of anesthesiology who refuses to come in at night, and Garven abuses the poor timid anesthesiology resident on call. Again, Garven starts the case, but cannot keep up the tasks of the anesthesiologist and surgeon, and has to beg for the anesthesiologist to come in. He finally does, but the entire interchange is dangerously nasty. The anesthesiologist threatens Garven, and Garven takes more notes. The likelihood that the evidence will be needed in the future seems all the more likely.

Garven’s interpersonal relationships are rife with mistakes. He neglects and is brusque with his wife; he criticizes the VA way of doing things, and he takes up again with the secretary who had been so seductive on his previous rotation. This time he succumbs and starts up his second full-fledged affair, heedless of the fact that he is putting his marriage and his residency career in jeopardy. Like many an adulterer, Garven Wilsonhulme thinks he is invisible.

At the end of his third (senior) year, Garven receives a letter with good news and bad news from Dr. Stark. He is to become next year’s chief resident as expected, but he has to do an additional—fifth—year of residency, which is not expected and not appreciated. He stands up for himself and is informed that Dr. Stark has no choice. He must comply with a new university policy, and Garven is the unfortunate fall guy. Garven extracts a contract from his boss that he will be regarded as the chief resident and as a junior staff man for the next two years and then he will continue on the faculty of the division of neurosurgery thereafter.

Elizabeth is once again dismayed at the perfidy of the slave system that holds her husband and herself in thrall, and once again their relationship sours. Garven turns ever more towards his VA lover and trouble, unaware that he is once again coming under observation. His lover begins to pressure him, and Garven begins to realize the immensity of what his affair can cost him, if he fails to divest himself of his entanglement.

Things get a little better for him. He is now paid a full $200 a month, and he gets to do more significant surgery. He is becoming known as a reliable and capable neurosurgeon by his colleagues and by the neurology service which is the source of valuable patients. He has to do less night work, and is now able to be home more and to begin anew to mend fences with his wife who is the mother of his child and the only source of real money in his life. On the negative side, he develops antagonistic relations with the other two junior staff men who present ultimatums to Dr. Stark: either Wilsonhulme leaves, or we do. Dr. Stark chooses Garven. One of the staff men physically attacks Garven in his OR during an operation, and Garven gives the man a thorough beat-down. The final confrontation results in both junior staff men resigning. Garven’s workload increases significantly, and that further sours his life with Elizabeth.

The next year, Garven wins a struggle to do an operation that the vascular surgeons consider to be in their exclusive domain, and Garven garners a few more enemies. His world—the world of academia—is a fang and claw jungle, and Garven fights as hard as he once did on the UP docks in Phoenix. He proves not to be a man to cross.

In 1964, while the chief is away at meetings, the regents of the UC system decide to depose him in favor of Dr. Chou, the second in command. Dr. Stark accepts his demotion quietly but with no measure of forgiveness. He knows that life is long, and he may one day repay Dr. Chou for his betrayal. He chooses to bide his time. Garven continues to write his condemnatory notes and to bide his own time.

Purchase your copies of “The Young Coyote”, “Anything Goes”, “Heaven And Hell” ,”The Long Climb” and “Academia: The Law of the Jungle” here”.

Continue on with Carl’s saga in Book 6, “THE VULTURE and THE PHOENIX”

-Harvey Birsner, M.D., F.A.C.S.
Diplomate, American Board of Neurological Surgery
Fellow, North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society
Clinical Professor, Neurosurgery, Univ. of Texas,
Southwestern Medical School, Dallas
Associate Clinical Professor, Neurosurgery,
University of Southern California, Los Angeles

Posted in Mini-synopses of books by Carl Douglass | Tagged , | Leave a comment

THE LONG CLIMB, by Carl Douglass, is the irreverent and uncompromising saga of a surgeon in training during the bygone era during which I did my own training. The protagonist in this, the fourth book in Douglass’s SAGA of a NEUROSURGEON six book series is Garven Wilsonhulme, M.D., a recent graduate from medical school, who is now off to his surgical internship and general surgery training programs. The story is accurate and brings back memories–not all of which are good–but the gripping reality of the author’s narrative is spell-binding.

Garven makes the obligatory trips to prominent hospital training centers on a financial shoestring that characterizes most of his existence to this point in his life. When he visits the university in Dallas, he meets the chief of the division of neurosurgery who tells him, “Sorry, I don’t have time to talk to you right now…[but] I have a case you might find interesting.”

“The two neurosurgeons step aside and open the curtain front on the exam cubicle. Garven walks in and almost jumps out of his shoes. There, sitting propped up on a gurney, is a thin, wasted, Negro derelict with a hatchet imbedded in the right side of his forehead. Garven is offered the chance to apply for the beginning years of his residency at Dallas, but the intern matching program ends up with him going instead to  the University of California Osterlund Memorial Hospital in downtown Los Angeles—a thoroughgoing blood-and-guts training institution.”

Just before he leaves to start his advanced training, Garven presents a voided check from his prospective father-in-law to his fiancé and her mother as proof of their father and husband’s manifest ill will. Mrs. Fletcher and Elizabeth assure him that he and Elizabeth will marry; there will be no pre-nuptial agreement, and Mr. Fletcher will come to his senses. Garven and Arthur Fletcher enter into a grudging civility, well short of cordiality, but enough to get a marriage planned, to allow Garven to see a termination to his seemingly endless financial problems.

On the first day of his internship, Garven is assigned to the notoriously man-killing work service of cardiovascular surgery. His first day is forty-two hours long. His first time as a surgical assistant involves a surgical blood loss of 114 units of blood and a twelve hour stint of being unable to get a drink of water or go to the bathroom. That proves to be a harbinger of things to come.

Time off to get married is prohibited by the chief of surgery at Osterlund Memorial. When Garven approaches him for an exception to his rule, Dr. Lyons tells him, “You don’t need to be married; that’s what back stairs and student nurses are for.” Garven goes ahead anyway and makes a pact with his fellow interns and residents to cover for him in exchange for a herculean stint of Garven being on-call in payment. Somehow, the exhausted Garven makes it through the ceremony and spends his first night of nearly stuporous marital bliss in the Camelback Inn in Phoenix before getting back to the grind. He has gained a wife and an insurance policy against starvation and homelessness.
He finishes the cardiac surgery rotation with the chief of the surgery being sanctioned for gross negligence of a patient, and the chief resident being fired just for being in the operating room when it happens. Garven can see that his road ahead is fraught with hazard. Garven’s internship year is one long pattern of lack of sleep, atrocious diet, odious duties on the wards, and demeaning servitude in the operating room. He does grow as a real physician and toughens into a nearly indefatigable workaholic. From time-to-time, Garven is able to steal a case or two and begins to make his way as a cutter and a sewer. His reputation as a man who can be counted on to get things done and a bad man to have as an enemy grows apace with his crushing work load and indomitable work ethic. His new wife is roundly neglected as was his mother before her, all in the quest for success at any cost.

At critical junctures along the way through his two general surgery years, he encounters neurosurgeons who always seem to be the knights on white horses who save the day—at least in the mind of Garven Wilsonhulme. Garven sees mistakes and triumphs and makes a few of his own, all in the course of his growth and at the expense of some patients and his long-suffering wife. He develops an inner toughness that determines how he will handle the experiences that would defeat many a lesser man.

Douglass describes Garven’s first day in the emergency room—The Pit: “Garven’s first patient was violent. Two burly orderlies were holding him down when Garven entered the man’s curtain-enclosed cubicle. The man was yelling and blaspheming. He hurled invectives at the young intern…Garven could not do a thing with him.” The deputies assigned to The Pit were called to help as a last resort. “The guy in three is having trouble understanding the rules,” the nurse said…“We’ll pay him a visit,” the deputy said. There were noises in the cubicle…and shortly the two neckless deputies reported to Garven, “He has had an attitude adjustment. He is looking forwards to cooperating in every way.”
He misses his wife’s birthday and forgets to give her a present because he spends the day in urology clinic ministering to uriniferous old men. Through the year he assists on sex-change operations, conditions of massive hemorrhage including a tonsillectomy he performs that goes wrong, aids derelicts; so, they could return to their homes under Los Angeles highway bridges and their bottles of Thunderbird wine and Everclear. He watches Dr. Stark, head of neurosurgery, rescue a patient who had fallen into the hands of the orthopedic surgeons, and confirms his opinion that the University of California Osterlund Memorial Hospital neurosurgical training program is the place for him. To save his sanity and his marriage, Garven applies to and is accepted by the VA hospital for his core year of general surgery training–a program noted for its easy call schedule and gentlemanly hours. He is rudely surprised when that opportunity is cancelled, and he is forced against his own desires to continue at Osterlund Memorial when the University takes over the VA training program. Elizabeth is heartbroken to learn that she will be a residency widow for another year. Nevertheless, by some apparently parthenogenic miracle, she becomes pregnant. Garven tries to appear happy at the coming of the blessed event.

His last internship rotation is on neurosurgery, the service he has so longed to be a part of. It proves to be a nightmare because he has to take the place of a resident who quits out of sheer exhaustion and the quaint idea that he should actually have a life. Garven is on call and in the hospital almost the entire two months of his internship and can never do anything to please the chief. That notwithstanding, Garven develops a measure of confidence in his ability to withstand the rigors of neurosurgery and that he will be able to master the discipline eventually.

Garven learns the core requirements of being a surgical resident: how to convince families of patients to donate more blood than the patient needs; how to finagle a way to get the good surgical cases for himself and to foist the bad ones on to his unsuspecting colleagues; how to dump bad cases onto the medical service; and how never to be tricked into accepting a patient with a medical problem who might possibly need surgery someday; and how to dump a patient to the VA hospital. He learns the language, such as: “onions” [hernias], “fireballs of the Eucharist” [fibroids of the uterus], “fleas are bitin’” [phlebitis], and “henfections in the grimes” [infection in the groins]. He treats heroin addicts, violent drunks, a world-renowned concert pianist, stabbings, gun-shot wounds, crazy people, and has his heart strings tugged when he saves a little black boy from “the smilin’ mighty Jesus” [spinal meningitis]. He misses an impending ruptured appendix and a tubal pregnancy.

After a particularly long stint on the surgical wards, he comes back to his apartment to discover that his wife and baby son have left him and have returned to Phoenix. This precipitates a second rancorous exchange of threats between Garven and his father-in-law, Arthur Fletcher, concerning who was the head of his household. He tells her irate father, “Elizabeth has led a spoiled child’s life, and it is time she learns to put up with a few things. You tell her for me that I will expect her to back at our apartment in two days from now.”…and hangs up on the powerful business executive. Elizabeth grudgingly returned, but their marriage is passing over rocky shoals. He begins a serious flirtation with a VA secretary and sufferes a few, but no particularly serious, pangs of conscience in so doing.
Near the end of his general surgery training year, he receives official notification of his acceptance into the neurosurgery training program. When he awakens on that first day of training, he is a neurosurgeon, and has a smile for the old coyote he used to see in Cipher, Arizona during the days when he was expected to amount to nothing just like the town where he grew up.

-Robert  A. Jacobsen, M.D., F.A.C.S.
Retired General Surgeon,
Tanner Memorial Clinic, Layton, Utah
Former Chief of Surgery,
Davis Hospital and Medical Center, and
Past President Davis County Medical Society

Purchase your copies of “The Young Coyote”, “Anything Goes”, “Heaven And Hell” and “The Long Climb” here”.

Continue on with Carl’s saga in Book 5, “ACADEMIA: THE LAW of the JUNGLE”

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Mini-synopses of books by Carl Douglass | Tagged , | Leave a comment

HEAVEN AND HELL, by Carl Douglass, the retired neurosurgeon turned author, finds young Garven Wilsonhulme back in Arizona because he cannot return to Stanford with any degree of peace of mind.

His financial straits require him to room with his alcoholic high school classmate and two other semi-literate Neanderthals who live in a dilapidated, cluttered, and uninviting apartment. They get him a job at the Union Pacific Railroad trucking docks where the law of fang and claw is in force without any gentlemanly niceties. Once again, the small man from Cipher has to fight for his spot. He manages to visit his long-neglected mother, to ride the red-rock hills with his old nemesis and friend, an apache Indian, and to have a serious and life-changing conversation with his ailing adoptive father. With the help of Dr. Wilsonhulme and his two professor friends from the University of Arizona, Garven makes a critical detour in his university career. He has to say a little insincere prayer that his run-in with the Stanford psychology professor will never come to light.

He finishes his undergraduate education with honors at the U of A without the temptations to get involved in childish pranks but not without the considerable angst that goes along with being a pre-med student who will succeed no matter what the cost to himself or anyone else he can use or who gets in his way. The school is like his brawling work, except the opponents are more subtle and use better language. Garven is momentarily distracted by the seductions of working in a car parts department and by the owner’s daughter, both of which he determinedly rejects, just as he decides not to follow the glory trail of working to conquer communism in Washington D.C. for Senator Joe McCarthy. Back on track, he applies to numerous medical schools and is rejected by most of them, and cannot afford some which do accept him. Finally, he gets his acceptance into the Arizona Faculty of Medicine beginning in 1952.

On his first day of orientation into the class of 1956, the dean of the medical school gives the freshman students an admonition:

“Medicine is a jealous mistress. She will require that you choose her over wife, children, church, community, or personal pursuits. If you cannot give her what she needs, this is the day to recognize that in yourself and to quit. Go on to something easier and more fun. Be a Renaissance man or woman, be an artist, a Thoreau, a business tycoon. You will not be a doctor. Save yourself misery, and the profession shame.”

It is worth a quote from HEAVEN and HELL to understand what the first day of medical school and the first class of the day, Gross Anatomy, is like:

“The smell was sickening and pungent…For many students it was the first time they had seen a dead person…Garven inhaled a deep breath and pinched himself hard enough to raise a visible welt to make sure he would not faint. All around him there were pale green faces…One of the men in the group turned ghastly white, took two steps backward and fainted into Dr. Yosobuchi’s arms…
“Kind of looks like roast beef, doesn’t he?” Garven said to Maria.
Elijah David whispered, “Kinda does, all right. Doesn’t look kosher,” he grinned.
Brent said, “Hey, lay off. Nothing about this reminds me of food. I don’t know what restaurant you’ve been getting your roast beef at, but let me know; so, I can keep clear of it, Garven.”

Thus chastened, Garven makes it a regular practice to eat roast beef sandwiches for lunch while he and his lab-mates dissect their cadaver. The daily grind consumes the lives of the students, and half of them are gone by the time the class limps its way to graduation. They immerse themselves in an ocean of arcane and crucial facts, endure exhaustion and humiliation, and carry out some classical medical student pranks. Garven cannot resist and, once again, is the ring leader of several, such as putting an amputated penis into the lab coat of a visiting student from the community.

The need for money takes on grim overtones. Garven works as a lab assistant for a biochemist and runs afoul of the director of the lab. He gets a job as an assistant to the county medical examiner. Because the ME’s office is so swamped, he does autopsies by himself to which the ME’s signature is affixed. He obtains a student loan at a usurious interest rate. He lives on two meals a day, mostly stolen from the hospital. He gets seriously behind on his rent. Finally, in his copious free time, he takes on a second job.

Who needs to sleep, anyway?

That job becomes the catalyst for his future. He becomes a lab assistant to the med school’s new neurosurgeon and has an epiphany: he determines that he will be a neurosurgeon after developing a serious case of hero worship for the icily calm and proficient brain surgeon. Thereafter, Garven encounters his hero in a variety of serious situations and becomes increasingly impressed with the man and his specialty. Garven Wilsonhulme also begins his career-long interest in academic research and a soaring ambition to become one of the princes of academia.

The clinical years, 1954-1956, are Garven’s first encounter with the realities of caring for living patients, and are full of the stuff of fear, pathos, depression, and exaltation. He learns to be a doctor and loves all of it. Garven makes mistakes and becomes the subject of public criticism, and he has small triumphs of one-up-mans-ship which keep the spark of his ambition going. He meets death and untreatable disease head-on. Among the lessons he learns are the fact that he is not built to be anything but a surgeon. The mundane lives and passions of the “swamis”—internists—are more than the budding surgeon can endure, and he develops all of the prejudices of the “real doctors”—the surgeons.

In his new job as an extern in a local private hospital, Garven comes face-to-face with the grim specter of a grossly malformed baby about to be delivered. What he and the attending physician do shock him to his core and make him question his own and his chosen profession’s ethical base. Later on in his obstetrics rotation, he runs afoul of the influential chief of the service and starts what will be a smoldering feud with a powerful adversary. The second time he runs afoul of the chief’s rules come when he delivers a baby in the mother’s kitchen in a Phoenix slum. He makes an incision that is not the traditional sort required by the chief and has to pay penance for the rest of the rotation. A strong mutual dislike colors his relationship with the unforgiving professor.

“Young man,” Dr. Caesar said, “you are at strike two. I will personally monitor your progress. One more foul-up, and I will recommend that you repeat your tour on OB. Now get out of my sight.”

And Dr. Caesar does everything he can to make Garven’s life a daily hell. The maltreatment only comes to an end when Dr. Caesar delivers a fetal monster and ends its existence before it can destroy the lives of its parents. Knowing that Garven is a witness makes the senior obstetrician relent, and the two men share a secret that Garven tucks away to use another day.

Lack of money becomes a deciding factor in Garven’s career and threatens to end it before it can really begin. It is a serious but necessary financial drain for him to visit hospitals where he might become an intern. He discovers a secret room in the hospital where he can live rent free and steals food from the trays of patients too sick to eat in order to keep his own body and soul together.

At this critical juncture of his life, he meets the daughter of the richest man in Arizona; and, despite her psychological issues and lack of real beauty, he woos and wins her as the answer to his otherwise insoluble financial woes. Her father has seen a string of gold-diggers come and go in their quests to marry into his fortune and determines to get rid of Garven as the latest in the line of dishonest suitors. In the dramatic last scene in the book, the antagonistic prospective father-in-law offers Garven an insulting, but huge bribe—one that could cure the young man’s every financial ill. For Garven, it is extremely tempting; but he is playing a much higher stake game of social poker. He defies the important businessman by refusing the proffered check and holds on to it to show his fiancé.

The author, Carl Douglass, ends Book Three with these sentences:

“It was a colossal bluff, the most audacious of his young life. Emotionally, Garven was somewhere in a place between heaven and hell.”

-Paul Olson, M.D., F.A.C.S., Ophthalmology

Purchase your copies of “The Young Coyote”, “Anything Goes” and “Heaven And Hell” here”.

Continue on with Carl’s saga in Book 4, “The Long Climb”

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Mini-synopses of books by Carl Douglass | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

ANYTHING GOES, by my now favorite author, Carl Douglass, begins where THE YOUNG COYOTE leaves off.

Garven Wilsonhulme, escapee from the dust and ignorance of his hometown, Cipher, Arizona, has clawed his way through a high-echelon California prep school, into Stanford, and has made it to his sophomore year—a feat that was not a forgone conclusion. Despite the risks to himself, Garven continues to be the legendary boy prankster, and his weary adoptive father, Dr. Wilsonhulme, lays down the law: behave or be cut off. Garven is no fool; he straightens up and becomes what he was meant to be—an intellectual and classroom force to be reckoned with, and a disciplined fighter. He takes the Pacific Coast wrestling championship. His focus on getting into medical school hardens into an implacable drive which will brook no serious challenges. He takes extra classes, finds tutors for the subjects where he is deficient, and he takes his serious fights to venues of obscurity. When he discovers a classmate in his quantitative analysis chemistry course tampering with his “unknown”—a chemical which Garven must identify and quantify down to ten-thousandth of a gram—he ignores protocol niceties and challenges him to a fight in an empty gymnasium and very nearly kills him. The pattern is now set in stone for Garven. Get in his way at your peril, and this is a credo that will follow his career for the rest of his life. He will never ask for quarter nor give one.

The renowned professor of psychology who gives Garven a job as a lab subject in one of his studies holds the key to Garven’s grade-point-average and his success or failure at the university. A bad grade from him, and Garven can kiss his chances of getting into medical school good-bye. When the professor refuses to pay him for the work Garven has done for the entire year, Garven asks for what he is due, then demands what is right—both of which antagonize the important and pivotal professor. To spite the uppity young man, the professor deliberately drops his grade to a ‘C’ which will destroy the ultimately ambitious young man who has come up from Cipher. Shortly before final grades are to come up for the quarter, Garven confronts his nemesis and brings about events resulting in a colossal change for aspiring doctor. There seems to be no way out of this entanglement, and Garven is tested to his uttermost.

-Neal Dastrup
Author: My Implausible Memoirs and The Icy Strait;
Proprietor: Alaskan Bear Lodge, Excursion Inlet, Alaska.

Purchase your copies of “Anything Goes” and “The Young Coyote” here”.

Continue on with Carl’s saga in Book 3, “Heaven And Hell

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Mini-synopses of books by Carl Douglass | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

THE YOUNG COYOTE, by Carl Douglass, tells the beginning of the story—the saga—of a boy who will succeed, whatever the cost to himself or to anyone who gets in his way.

Ten-year-old Garven Aloysius Carmichael sits on a broken old fence yearning to be accepted into the social milieu of the town into which he and his mother have been forced to move after they are abandoned by Garven’s father. He has several strikes against him: he is young, small, the son of the new teacher, has an atrociously pompous name; and worse, he is a new boy in town. The town is a dust bowl in the Arizona desert and newness is not a concept well received there. Already at ten, he is a fighter. He has had to defend himself against the taunts from boys who mock his name which his alcoholic father garnered from an Englishman in a bar. He studies the ongoing football game being played with near total disregard for rules and with necessary mayhem. He summons his courage and wedges his way onto one of the ad hoc teams. That day, in a series of fights, he earns his place.
Garven’s goal is to escape the cloistering confines of the town—Cipher, Arizona—and to avoid being trapped there as a cipher himself for the rest of his life. That, too, is a fight. He becomes the leader of a pack of boys for whom escalating pranks are the greatest achievement possible for them, and Garven is a born leader. He moves from trouble to trouble, mostly due to scrapes brought on by himself. As he grows, the major quality of his character is brought out—he has an overarching ambition. He will win at all costs. His mother, Rachel, despairs for his chances ever to be able to use his good brain and that he will end his days as a thug like his ignorant school friends—a disenfranchised Apache, and a dedicated neer-do-well. Her desperation leads her to the town doctor who recognizes Garven’s potential and takes him under his wing. Dr. Wilsonhulme offers the boy and his mother a chilling alternative to his present life’s course. He will sponsor Garven’s acceptance into an exclusive boys’ prep school in California, but Garven will have to leave his place as a cipher in Cipher, and from his mother’s care and keeping forever.
Garven accepts with enthusiasm, and Rachel with reluctance; but Garven starts his prep school as a ninth grader in a school—Burton-Cagle Prep–he has never heard of in a state where he has never been, and among students and teachers who regard him as something of an untermenschen. As he has done all his young life, Garven fights; he adapts; and he prevails, albeit at a great cost. In order to remain in the school in a milieu that is beyond his initial capacities, he and his mother must agree to have the doctor adopt him legally. Garven gladly sheds his ridiculous middle name and changes his surname to Wilsonhulme. Through a series of landmark pranks, epic fights, and integrity scarring decisions, Garven rises to the top of the school and gains acceptance to Stanford University.
Then, Garven’s real life’s fight begins in earnest. The competition is tougher and less forgiving. But here the college freshman’s real assets come to the fore. He has a native intelligence, a learned cunning, and an indomitable will which serves him well. He faces his fears and braves the California bear in his den. He gains acceptance as Stanford’s legendary prankster, pays some steep prices for his complicity, and faces serious disciplinary action—a punitive action which threatens his now fully developed goal of becoming a rich doctor. He connives, evades, casts blame on others, lies, and at times, cheats. Nothing is going to stand in his way. Garven makes fast friends at Stanford, men whom he will use later as his career needs dictate.
His fledgling Stanford career is checkered, but in the end successful. He is more amazed than his detractors when he is allowed to continue to his sophomore year a bit bruised but unchastened, unrepentant, and certainly not vanquished.

-Neal Dastrup
Author: My Implausible Memoirs and The Icy Strait;
Proprietor: Alaskan Bear Lodge, Excursion Inlet, Alaska.

Purchase your copy of “The Young Coyote” here.

Continue on with Graven in Book 2, “Anything Goes

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Mini-synopses of books by Carl Douglass | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

There are 830,000 doctors in the United States; almost half of them are over age fifty; and a significant proportion of them see fewer patients than they did even four years ago [Physicians Foundation Survey, 2012].

The problem of declining numbers of practicing physicians is compounded by several factors:

  • physicians are less satisfied with their medical careers and are retiring early or going into other professions;
  • baby boomers are swelling the ranks of patients needing Medicare;
  • health care reform is ushering in millions of patients (as many as 30 million) who previously were uninsured but now have access to health care financially.

Family practice physicians are inundated already, and the massive influx of new patients has barely started.

The United States is, at this early stage of absorbing the massive numbers of newly insured patients and newly arriving Medicare recipients, short 16,000 family care physicians—family practioners, pediatricians, and general internists—and we are estimated to be short by 90,000 in the next ten years.

For a variety of reasons, all very important, we are not producing as many primary care physicians as previously and not nearly as many as we need now or that we will need in the future as the problem worsens: recent medical school graduates have accumulated massive educational debts; it is not at all unusual for the new M.D. to have $250,000 in loans which he or she will never be able to pay on a primary practioner’s income; so, he or she will face a lifetime career of paying the unforgivable (by law) interest debt.

That, of course, is a strong disincentive to practice primary care and a strong incentive to go into a higher paying specialty. Starting salaries for primary care physicians are from $80-120 or 150,000 per year compared to gastroenterologists and radiologists who make twice that and neurosurgeons, cardiac surgeons, plastic surgeons, and cardiologists who often bring in two or three times that amount per year.

There has been a major social change in attitudes of new physicians; they feel like they should have a life including time off with their families. They avoid specialties which require being up in the night, or of having onerous night, weekend, and holiday call schedule responsibilities.

Many bright and ambitious students are choosing other careers. State and private institutional funds are drying up; so, new medical schools are not being built or even planned. Current medical schools are decreasing the numbers of students in their classes. The massive costs in both money and time required to get through residency programs is daunting to many would-be doctors—five years for a neurosurgeon after an internship and core year of general surgery training, for example.

All of that begs the question of what can be done. The following list comes from several different sources, and it is well to bear in mind that We the People will have to bear some increased expenses in the form of taxes and increased insurance premium costs to make the changes happen.

  • Some states are proposing that medical school be cut to three years instead of four.
  • Some states offer incentives to family care doctors such as providing a scholarship to defray the costs of the first year of medical school.
  • Many states and private medical care organizations offer a team approach—less complicated cases can be seen by nurse practitioners and physicians’ assistants. Some provide a sliding-fee scale for such care.
  • Advances in technology, communication, and improved patient education can reduce the need for return clinic visits.
  • Physician extenders”—nurse practitioners and physicians’ assistants are being granted more autonomy to provide care, and the result is that more people are taking advantages of the incentives to become care providers without having to be caught in the web of confiscatory educational costs.
  • Better health care education, especially with regards to diet, nutrition, exercise, and early preventative care, as provided by the Health Care Reform act serves to reduce the cost of medical care and the frequency of visits to clinics. The Health Care Reform Act of 2010 provides some funding for such purposes.
  • Permitting more foreign trained physicians to become licensed in the United States is a measure that can bring an amelioration of the shortages quickly.
  • The PPACA [The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act—Health Care Reform—of 2010] failed in one major issue. Malpractice tort reform, such as has been enacted by the State of California, is missing in the Act, and that markedly interferes with all facets of the delivery of medical care, increases the costs, and reduces the number of physicians overall and particularly the number willing to take night call, to treat serious and complicated cases, and to treat people who are unable or unwilling to comply with good medical practice. That must change before the United States will be able to have a health care delivery system anywhere near comparable to the excellent systems in Europe.
  • Better pay for primary care physicians is part of the PPACA, but it is too little and too late. Malpractice insurance rates are climbing at an alarming rate; Medicare payment rates decline or threaten to do so every year; and both of those factors discourage the best and the brightest from entering low paying fields. State and federal government sources must find means of increasing physician and auxiliary provider incomes or face an increase in the shortage of providers.

Finally, and of paramount importance, is that government must rid itself of the notion that healthcare is a fertile ground for political posturing. The doctor shortage is not a Democrat or Republican issue, a right or left issue, or an issue that can be ignored without serious consequences.

Health care delivery and improving our problem of an American shortage of doctors is just that: An American problem. It is time to get on with real, objective, and timely solutions and no more proposals made to ensure the re-election of anyone.

What do you think?  Share you views, opinions, insights etc. by leaving a comment below.

Carl Douglass – Author
Carl Douglass Books
www.carldouglass.com

“Neurosurgeon Turned Author Writes With Gripping Realism”

To experience Carl’s compelling works, follow the link below:

Books By Carl Douglass

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Health Care Reform | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

DRIVERS OF COST, conclusion

Medical Technology, Health Care Facilities and Systems, Compassion:

Like pharmaceuticals, the medical technology industry has grown at a staggering rate, and the cost keeps pace with the newness. “Health care consumers rarely say no to a hot new product…that can extend or improve the quality of patients’ lives,” the New York Times reported. The Advanced Medical Technology Association, which includes 90% of the world’s producers, states that health care technology cost the United States $79 billion and was worth a total of $169 billion worldwide in 2011. The total cost of medical imaging worldwide in 2006 was $100 billion, a rise of $20 billion in two years, according to Stateside Dispatch. A Blue Cross Blue Shield Association study released in October, 2007 detailed the extent to which new technologies have become a major factor in cost increases for hospital expenditures. Hospital costs increased 11.8% from 1998-2000; of that increase, 19% was linked to the use of new technology. Necessity is the mother of invention, and technology is the product of creative minds to contribute to the health of our citizens. Upfront capital outlays are steep and must be factored into the equation and paid for by individuals and taxpayers when all debits are tallied. Since there is already a substantial customer base, sales boom, and the third party payers and a few unlucky self-insured individuals watch with alarm as the costs increase concomitantly.

Health Care Facilities and Systems:

Hospitals, nursing homes, hospice care, in-home care, and other long-term care strategies are costly; and the price goes up every year. American Hospital Association researchers identified “hospital mergers and industry consolidation that reduced competition” as the direct cause of 18% of the increase in hospital costs in 1998-2000. HMOs are regularly consolidating and becoming more profitable. We live longer, and many of us live healthier lives for a long period of time, and there is a price for that. We have added about ten years of longevity to both men and women over the past ten years. According to UMA research as reported by Dr. Blair, “In the 1st quarter of 2005, HMOs showed a $1.4 billion profit”. In 2006 the three largest publicly traded companies–United Health Group, Aetna, and WellPoint–showed a combined profit over expenses of $9 billion for the year. Weiss Ratings reported that more than half of the HMOs are financially strong, and the number of plans considered weak financially dropped from 40% in 1998 to 17% in 2004. In 2000 New York HMO profits climbed to $403 million, an increase over the previous year of 315%. By 2003, New York HMOs reported $1 billion profits, an increase of 32% over 2002. MarketWatch reported that WellCare of New York reported profits of $3.89 million for the first 9 months of 2003, a 32,575 % profit compared to $11,900 in 2002. This is significant because 13% of the nation’s HMO profits were produced in New York, according to the American Trial Lawyers Association. Similar stratospherical profit increases were reported the same year by Aetna Healthcare of Texas-9,724%, Kaiser Foundation of Ohio-3,467%, Health Plus of Michigan-2,434%, and HMO Health Plans of Colorado-2,295%. UnitedHealthcare, the nation’s largest health insurer, reported $28.8 billion in gross revenues in 2003 and projected $36 billion in earnings for 2004. The company’s quarterly profits in 2007 rose 15% to $1.28 billion a quarter. That same company dropped all individual health insurance policies in Florida, Kansas, Missouri, and Illinois on the grounds that they were not profitable enough.

However, nothing in the health care delivery quagmire is simple, and controversy abounds. Paul Ginsberg, an economist at the Center for Studying Health System Change, said, “Profits might explain part of why costs are rising…new treatments and increased demand are fueling the rise.” He went on to state, “The thing I find dismaying is the public doesn’t recognize that it’s the additional medical care they’re getting that’s driving costs up They have to come to grips with the fact that we won’t be able to slow the rise in costs without making trade-offs”. He believes the focus on profits is misplaced. “I once calculated that if you rebated all the drug company profits to patients, health spending would only go down by 1.2%,” he says.

Many physicians can remember the time before the advent of HMOs when the public decried the perceived excessive livings enjoyed by physicians. What happened to the American public was a trade off to a more impersonal, more hurried kind of medical care that costs more than ever before. HMO executives and administrators are well paid, and there are a considerable number of them. Company stockholders are highly satisfied with the profits turned by those administrators. Collectively, HMO administrators bring in for themselves far more than those doctors did in the “bad old days before HMOs”. Although governmental regulations are being put into place to change the early practice of HMOs to accept only the young, healthy, and affluent, many people still find it difficult to be insured by HMOs and other private insurers if they have any adverse health history. If those people and the presently uninsured and illegal aliens are to be fully covered, the general cost of medical care will escalate. Something has to give: either doctors and hospitals have to accept lower fees; patients have to get fewer services; taxpayers have to raise the amount allocated to states’ human services to cover high overhead costs; many fewer recipients of health care must be designated; or…there must be sweeping health care delivery reform.

Compassion:

Americans spend considerable money because of our compassionate ways. We regularly treat one pound or smaller premature infants and severely handicapped children which would have been considered unsalvageable not very long ago. The results are often sad with a life devoid of a meaningful quality—blindness, deafness, heart and lung problems, mental retardation, and a child who is weak and sick and who consumes a great deal of expensive health care over a life time. The cost for neonatal care for such infants can run into the hundreds of thousands, even millions of dollars. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) makes the news regularly; classes are readily available to the public, and there is pressure to have the majority of our citizenry learn this year’s and next year’s new changes in resuscitation. The salvage statistics are dismal. Less than 1% of patients who suffer a verifiable cardiac arrest and receive life saving CPR survive neurologically intact. The death rate from cardiopulmonary arrest, even with CPR in ideal situations, remains very high. Survive or not, there is a significant monetary cost.

Across the nation, businesses that provide health care for their employees pay a hidden 17% premium tax to cover the costs of all of the care described in this article for the uninsured, according to UMA, and for persons who enter the nation illegally and consume health care monies, sometimes preferentially.

What do you think?  Share you views, opinions, insights etc. by leaving a comment below.

Carl Douglass – Author
Carl Douglass Books
www.carldouglass.com

“Neurosurgeon Turned Author Writes With Gripping Realism”

To experience Carl’s compelling works, follow the link below:

Books By Carl Douglass

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Featured, Health Care Reform | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

DRIVERS OF COST, PART TWO

Consumer Demand:

We Americans add fuel to the fire of out of control costs by insisting on having a CT or an MRI for chronic back pain when the indications are not present; the desire and the decision does not come from evidence-based-medicine but from anecdotal and media driven information. In general we insist upon–and providers cave into those demands to keep the peace–costly procedures because insurance or the government will pay. We demand cosmetic products and procedures and lifestyle health measures and demand that they be included in insurance packages; so, the financial burden can be shared. Without knowledge of the true costs, most Americans are willing to consume more and to allow the costs to escalate. Without personal visible consequences and controls that directly impact such consumers they will not stop. Employers paid 80% of health insurance premiums for their employees in the 1980s and 1990s which has declined to 70% today, but these contributions act to hide the true costs from the individual consumer. The costs are becoming staggering to employers, many of whom are opting out of providing such benefits, or now limit the number and quality of services to less attractive options, or hire more part-time (unfunded) employees; or some simply give up and go out of business and put their employees out of work–in ever increasing numbers.

We, The People, overuse medications, such as antibiotics and expensive pain killers, at our health and financial peril. Prescription drugs account for 10% of the national health expenditure. Doctors are weak in denying antibiotics for such things as viral infections when faced with a demanding, often angry, and unreasonable patients who take up an inordinate amount of “throughput” time.

Courts and Judicial System:

Courts and the judicial system are creating an ever-increasing burden for medical care in the form of the American penchant to sue—described by some attorneys as the poor man’s easiest way to win the lottery; There have been confiscatory rises in medical malpractice insurance rates of 250-400% for some specialties in the past decade–an astronomical rise compared to even the most liberal measurements of inflation. Some estimates suggest that as much as 40% of the total cost of medical care can be traced to defensive medicine. Fear of lawsuits is resulting in early retirements on the part of our most experienced physicians, and many providers opt not to engage in necessary but risk laden procedures for self-protection. The law of supply and demand applies here as elsewhere: scarcity breeds increased prices. Even if one accepts the conclusion by the Utah Medical Insurance Association (UMIA) that the most common cause in Utah for filing a malpractice suit is actual malpractice, the damage payments, especially for punitive damages, drive medical costs up seriously; and no plan to curb costs can ever fail to address tort issues. Perhaps the worst (and politically based) flaw in the PPACA is that it completely ignores the impact of tort issues or tort reform. It is my studied opinion—an opinion shared by many other physicians, attorneys, politicians, and health care companies—that the PPACA will never achieve its hoped for potential and may well fail on the tort reform issue alone.

Government Regulations and Programs:

Governmental regulations at all levels—laws, monitoring, and mandates—all carry a cost which in the end is passed on to the consumer. According to Dr. Blair, “It is estimated that the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) alone accounts for over $15 billion to manage and maintain.” Even with all of the regulations and gate keeping, government is inefficient and costly. Medicare lowers the fees paid to physicians every year until many physicians just give up and opt not to care for the elderly. Unless bills in Congress supporting pay cuts to physicians serving Medicare are regularly defeated, physicians will see a 10% decrease in their Medicare payments. Many care providers will simply bow to the inevitable and drop Medicare or leave medical practice altogether. We do not have enough physicians; we cannot produce enough more in the future to make a meaningful difference; and we are losing too many because of the craven political decision to short change health care providers. Some Medicare recipients across the United States are beginning to find it more and more difficult to find a physician. Despite that bit of penny pinching, Medicare is far from frugal. A non-Medicare recipient with chronic respiratory illness, for example, usually purchases the equipment at retail prices and pays about $100 a month for oxygen tanks with deliveries for three years–about $3,600. However, Medicare rents the equipment and oxygen for 3 years at a cost of around $8,280—a cost borne largely by American tax-payers. The cumulative cost for such equipment was $1.8 billion in 2006. During the same year the system put out $21 billion on pumps for disabled and elderly men to obtain erections. Medicare paid $450 for the equipment which is easily available online for $100. A walking cane can be purchased online for about $11, but Medicare pays $20. Another example of waste is $20 million which is incurred in the federal Vaccines for Children program by failure to refrigerate the vaccines properly (hundreds of thousands of doses). Beyond the financial waste, this forces large numbers of children to have their vaccinations a second time.

Attempts to correct these inequities have failed thus far due to industry lobbyists who also enlist the unpaid services of their elderly clients as co-lobbyists. Politicians cannot anger their Medicare constituents; that is one of the third rails of politics; so, nothing changes. Physicians’ groups, device manufacturers, insurance companies, and allied businesses, and vulnerable patients constitute a formidable lobbying bloc, and, as long as the present system exists, the lobbyists will prevail.

The United States health care system is capitalism and democracy in action and is as messy as those two entities can be. Services are duplicated; redundant and unnecessary tests are regularly performed. Physician shortages, especially in fields such as psychiatry and family practice, and critical nurse shortages drive wages up, and there is no end in sight. Dr. Blair informs us that in Utah 38% of physicians are over age 50 and many of them are looking to retirement from a profession that is no longer satisfying. In states with high litigation rates, that percent is even higher. A study involving 5,000 physicians was conducted by The Doctor’s Company revealed that 90% of those doctors would not recommend health care as a profession. (Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons, June, 2012). Commenting on that study , Paul H. Jordan, M.D., F.A.C.S., who graduated from medical school 58 years ago, reflected on his own experiences and asked the seminal question: “Is medicine still a good profession?” This elderly surgeon acknowledged the many impediments that exist to the enjoyment of a career in medicine, but was philosophical in his answer. The great advancements in medicine make this a golden era, not unlike many golden eras that preceded it, and that makes up for the drawbacks. Not all physicians are so sanguine. There is a deficit in the number of physicians in training to replace the physicians who are leaving. Among the things Dr. Jordan found to be detractions to a medical career are increased supervision by institutional review boards, expanded use of patient consent forms, overzealous peer review of manuscripts submitted to journals, and governmental regulations that interfere with patient care and physicians’ earnings. Workforce issues should not just be a concern for providers and their professional organizations.

Medications and the Pharmaceutical Industry:

Medications improve at a dramatic rate in the United States, and the costs escalate geometrically. Treatment of mental illness is a major driver of health care inflation and is second only to heart disease. Antidepressives among health care treatments contribute heavily to that cost inflation. According to the journal, Health Affairs in 2004, pharmacists filled more than $146 million worth of antidepressive SSRI medications alone.

Pharmaceutical companies pass on the costs of their research and development, governmental regulation costs, and advertising to We, The People. In 2007 medications were 11% of the cost of care, and that figure is expected to rise to 14% by 2010. Investors in pharmaceutical companies average profits of 19% per year. The pharmaceutical industry and all other sectors of the health care industry, except for physicians, receive yearly funding increases from the Medicare Economic Index, which was created to cover the cost of delivering medical care.

According to Dr. Elizabeth Whelan of the Business and Media Institute, consumer prices for prescribed pharmaceuticals increased at an annual rate of 2.3% over all; for branded products the rise was 3.4% per year. Pharmaceuticals are regularly listed as the nation’s most profitable industry by the annual May Forbes 500 ranking of top industries. The costs of producing medications are staggering. Before a new chemical can reach a pharmacy shelf, its company must proceed through an 11 year series of hoops required by the FDA, according to the Tufts University Center for the Study of Drug Development, to prove both efficacy and safety. The drug vetting process costs from $500 million to as much as $2 billion depending on the therapy or the developing firm, according to MarketWatch. The costs are factored with adjustment for inflation and when the losses for the many other chemicals that were tested and failed are considered. Consumer advocacy groups such as Public Citizen take exception to those estimates and state that the actual cost is more nearly $200 million.

Only one out of 5000 compounds discovered ever reaches a pharmacy shelf. A branded drug has a 10-15 year life, and it takes several years of sales build-up for even the eventually commercially successful drugs to reach full potential. Public Citizen puts the cost of compliance with FDA regulations at 29% of the start-up amount. The marketing costs are mind-boggling: drug companies spend around $19 billion in the US on promotions and advertising. They employ 100,000 sales representatives in the US to pursue 120,000 prescribers in the US. Drug companies also have significant cycles of loss—dry years. In 1993 Syntex, Merck, and Bristol-Meyer-Squibb (BMS) recorded 10,000 job losses Advertising costs per drug are astronomical—Prilosec, $4.19 billion and Prozac, $2.57 billion in 1993, for example. (Source-MM&M IMS America Business Watch, Top 200 drugs, Pharmacy Times.). The profits can be titanic: Pfizer’s Lipitor, the best-selling drug in the world, has brought in $12.9 billion for the company. Estimates of global spending for drugs vary depending upon whether the information is promulgated by an industry advocate or a critical citizens’ lobby. The low figure for 2006 was $600 billion, and the high figure $2.95 trillion. CEOs and other senior executives of the 10 largest manufacturers in 1999, the most recent year when full information was available, were paid salaries and bonuses ranging from $2.1 million (AMGEN) to $31.4 million (BMS) for the CEOs. The salaries were paltry in comparison to the unexercised stock option packages for the same executives: $104,506,000 (AMGEN) and $159,691,000 (BMS). The sweepstakes winner of the group of well-favored executives was the CEO of Warner-Lambert with unexercised stock options of $250,559,000.

Several advocacy groups that are critical of the pharmaceutical industry demand stringent price control policies. Drug companies insist that price controls would cripple innovation and research and development thereby delaying or failing the discovery of new “miracle drugs” and improvements in existing ones. The companies argue that limiting price increases to the inflation rate plus one percent would yield a $1.2 billion per year savings which would amount to a decrease in cost to the consumer of about seventy-five cents for a prescription. “Although 60% of Americans have no insurance coverage for drugs, for most the average out-of-pocket cost of pharmaceuticals is less than the cost of one year of cable television,” stated Robert Goldberg in 1993. It is a tricky balancing act to limit prices while preserving the capital markets and entrepreneurship of the pharmaceutical companies which produce the innovation that saves lives. Still, it is food for thought that more reasonable compensation for pharmaceutical executives and company stock investors and a substantial diminution in advertising expenditures would lessen the bite being suffered by American consumers. “A billion here, and a billion there can add up to real money,” as Senator Everett Dirksen once said of federal spending.

To be continued…

What do you think?  Share you views, opinions, insights etc. by leaving a comment below.

Carl Douglass – Author
Carl Douglass Books
www.carldouglass.com

“Neurosurgeon Turned Author Writes With Gripping Realism”

To experience Carl’s compelling works, follow the link below:

Books By Carl Douglass

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Featured, Health Care Reform | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
Picture of an Obese Teenager (146kg/322lb) wit...

Picture of an Obese Teenager (146kg/322lb) with Central Obesity, side view.Self Made Picture of an Obese Teenager (Myself) (146kg/322lb) with Central Obesity, Front View. Feel Free to use. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

American Health Care Delivery Performance

Our health care performance statistics fall short of the rest of the industrialized nations in many areas. However, during the past two decades, J.P.Morgan analysts, describing the situation on Wall Street, stated that, “anticipated rate hikes [for insurance companies] should more than cover their rising costs…insurers and managed-care companies reaped profits from insurance premiums of 12-18%”. The J.P. Morgan report assured investors that the companies should be able to continue to achieve the same high levels, “thanks to a combination of higher rates, higher co-payments, and higher deductibles”. The researchers predicted equally glowing future success for CIGNA, Wellpoint Health Networks, UnitedHealth Group, Oxford Health Plans, Health Net, Humana, and several Blue Cross Blue Shield plans. Bully for business, and not such great news for We the People out there trying to get by and to get good affordable health care.

We have a great national resource in our health care providers; life expectancy climbed to 77.8 years for a baby born in 2004, an improvement of three years over 1990, and life expectancy continues to inch upward. Mortality from heart disease, stroke, and cancer–the three main causes of death–continued to decline somewhat in recent years. We can do better: life expectancy in 1999 in the UK was 77.4, in Canada, 79, while, at that time, that figure was age 76.7 in the US. In 2013, we do better than that, but almost all developed nations continue to do better than we do. We should be able to do as well as those other comparable capitalism based economies. Our problem as Americans is to extend the benefits of all the commitment, work, and science extant in our truly marvelous American health care resources to every one of our citizens with a delivery system that we can afford, and that will take great compromises. Other nations do it successfully; so, we should not accept a third class status whatever our excuses may be.

An individual, as a consumer, employee, or employer, in America pays out money for health care in one form or another to governments at all levels, private commercial insurers, traditional and nontraditional health care service providers, to merchants for traditional and nontraditional medications, manufacturers of devices and technology, to the courts and legal systems, and for societal expectations. People without insurance who do pay for their care get nothing of the discount afforded employees of large businesses and insurance holders; on average they pay double. Over the past several decades there has been an upward sea change in health and financial costs with more and more people being left behind.

DRIVERS OF COST, PART ONE

Unhealthy Lifestyles:

In 1976 fifteen percent of Americans were obese, and the numbers began a steeper ascent in 1980. In 2006 thirty-two percent of Americans on average were obese. The statistics are even worse in some states. There are 72 million obese Americans, a far higher number per capita—and one that keeps on growing–than most of the rest of the world. Type II diabetes in the earlier era was a relatively uncommon problem, but with the rise in obesity, there has been a concomitant rise in diabetes with all its financial and human costs including heart disease and stroke. Obesity contributes to 300,000 US deaths each year; obesity in adulthood contributes to a decrease in life expectancy on a magnitude similar to smoking, the number one behavioral contributor to death. A child with one overweight parent has a 40% chance of being obese; with two overweight or obese parents, the child has an 80% chance. Obesity is associated with an increased risk of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular disease (CVD), obstructive sleep apnea, GERD, gallstones, gout, asthma, pseudotumor cerebri, cancers—breast, colon, and uterine—major depression, and suicidality.

Obesity rates appear to have come to a plateau at thirty-four percent, an unacceptable level which appears to be a new social “normal” despite herculean efforts at education from all informed sources. Among the obese, the obesity develops earlier, even in childhood, and is more severe. Experts concur that half of Americans will have diabetes if the current trends persist. Half!!. We cannot afford what we now have. Imagine that chronic disease wreaking almost twice as much trouble. Much of the etiology of obesity comes from sedentary lifestyles and preferential and habitual consumption of high glycemic (sugar) foods and foods high in fat, as are found in most fast food fare. Simple changes in choices could stem the tide and even virtually eradicate the problems of obesity and attendant diabetes with all of its complications. Federal laws are in the making to mandate healthy foods in schools, but that measure may be too-little-too-late. There are powerful social and business impediments to implementation of diets for children that are good for them and that they will eat. Parents need to resume control of their children’s diets and to educate them about the value of healthy choices. We, The People, need to have a respite from paying for the aftermath of such choices made by a significant minority of our population.

“Unhealthy life styles account for about 40% of the costs of health care. Obesity accounts for $91 billion; one in five (20.8%–45.3 million in 2006) Americans smoke, and smoking costs $137 billion (it is the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the nation), drugs and $300 billion, and trauma about $260 billion,” according to Dr. Blair. STD rates, including HIV/AIDS, gonorrhea, herpes, and even syphilis are on the rise with all of their attendant personal, social, and economic cost. The US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that the number of Americans infected with the AIDS virus is 50 percent higher than previously believed and the number of infected Americans is now between 55,000 and 60,000—a number that is growing despite a barrage of earnest communications about the dangers of the lifestyles and practices that spawn STDs. The medications are astoundingly expensive, are required lifelong (which is usually many decades); and, because of the debilitating character of the disease and the drugs used to treat it, many victims are unable to pay for their care; and the victims become unproductive drains on the public purse who are living longer and are costing more and more as time passes.

Death rates from motor vehicle related injuries have remained stable at 15 deaths per 100,000 people per year. Many of those deaths are related to careless driving, excessive speed, intoxication, and excessive drowsiness all of which are avoidable. Many injuries and deaths occur in the uninsured, and, in the end, the American taxpayer pays the cost. The National Health and Safety Administration estimated for 1994 that 4% of all traffic crash fatalities involved drowsiness and fatigue as principle causes. The cost was calculated to be $83,000 per fatality with a total cost of $12.5 billion, much of that from workplace loss and loss of productivity. Proper diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea and excessive daytime somnolence would greatly alleviate that cost; use of night time CPAP and day time use of a relatively new drug, Modifinal (Provigil) by people with the conditions would be a benefit for all Americans. Our motorized vehicles are far superior in terms of safety and survival after an accident than they were in the “good old days” of heavy, gas guzzling, steel vehicles. That should not much of a comfort to those of us who must foot the bill for the cost of such accidents, whatever the level of improvement there is.

A drug use survey conducted by the University of Michigan Institute for Social Research and released December 11, 2007 by the White House revealed that fewer young people use marijuana, and methamphetamine, or some other illegal street drugs, as reported by Theo Milonopoulos of the Los Angeles Times. But, the gradual decline in the “softer” illegal drug use has been offset by serious trends in teenage drinking, heroin, and cocaine use. Even more concerning is the developing misuse of prescription drugs such as Oxycodone, Hydrocodone, and Oxycontin. The Salt Lake Tribune, in its communication about the Times article, quoted Nora Volkow, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse which financed the University of Michigan’s survey. She observed, “Despite all of the successes of reduction of all of the illicit substances, the use of prescription medications has not budged.” Ten percent of teens reported that they have used Hydrocodone, the generic for Vicodin, for nonmedical purposes within the past year. The illicit use of prescription Oxycodone and Oxycontin, increased 30% since 2002. 71% of the young people found their drug of abuse in their parents’ medicine cabinets. Although the report indicated that 860,000 fewer children use drugs since 2001, as President Bush announced, most of that decline is due to a cutback in marijuana use which is the least dangerous of the street drugs. That is, of course, a good thing; one marijuana cigarette is the equal of five regular tobacco cigarettes in the amount of harm done to the user’s health. Cocaine and heroin use has remained steady, and the use of highly addicting prescription synthetic pain killers is growing at an alarming rate. The financial cost is daunting—to all of us–and the human cost is incalculable.

Pediatric specialty societies are becoming alarmed at a relatively recent fad for young girls to adopt vegetarian diets without having any idea how to maintain adequate protein intake. This results in osteoporosis, spinal, and long bone pathological fractures, dental and jaw bone demineralization loss with resultant destruction of teeth. This expensive problem is avoidable with proper education and parental intervention. Physicians are seeing a resurgence of rickets, a vitamin D deficiency syndrome which was rare a few years ago and should be nearly universally avoidable today. People, especially children and the elderly, are not getting out into the sun for even the twenty minutes a day required. They sequester themselves indoors with television and electronic gadgets at the expense of healthful outdoor exercise. They do not drink milk—most of American milk is Vitamin D fortified. They get hyperparathyroidism, hypercalcemia, and have falls (in the elderly). They and the taxpayers pay a significant price for such an unhealthy way of living.
A disturbing number of Americans choose, for one reason or another, not to be vaccinated and not to have their children vaccinated. Not only does that decision result in more disease and suffering—witness the frequent outbreaks of whooping cough and their effects on schools, children, families, and the health care system. (The disease is preventable)—but there is a considerable financial burden to be borne by all of us because of people who become infected due to exposure to these preventable infections. They consume health care dollars, miss work, and decrease productivity. For reasons of protection against disease and cost, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saint’s extensive missionary system no longer permits un-immunized missionaries to be sent out of the nation in which they live. Despite the beliefs and protests of those who oppose vaccinations, the benefit is readily apparent even in a single disease, measles. For decades, the number of new cases of measles that originate in the United States has been zero, and that is a direct outcome of vaccination programs and successes that have eradicated that most contagious of epidemic communicable disease which used to result in severe adverse effects and death at such an alarming rate. Eventually, measles, like smallpox will be a scourge of the past. On average, we see only about 200 cases of measles a year in the US; and every one of them originates from exposure outside our borders. Vaccinations work, and they save both lives and mountains of money.

Pneumococcal pneumonia kills more Americans than any other infectious disease agent and adds a very large monetary cost to the health care system. There are 50,000-63,000 cases of S. pneumoniae bacteremia and 13-19% of cases of meningitis are due to S. pneumoniae in the US each year. Prior to vaccination with conjugated pneumococcal vaccine, 200 children died each year of meningitis. In the US in 2005, there were 4,500 cases of antibiotic resistant S. pneumoniae. In Utah alone in 2006 332 Utahns died of pneumococcal pneumonia and 6000 were cared for in hospitals. They incurred costs ranging from $3,907 to $14,695. For patients with co-morbidities, the cost was even higher—ranging from $2,814 to $38,314, according to the Utah Medical Association (UMA).

Much the same can be said for influenza vaccinations. The disease has killed 36,000 Americans a year every year since 1990, and in not infrequent epidemics there resulted an average of 226,000 excess hospitalizations despite the existence of two safe and effective vaccines. Efficacy is 77% and 91% respectively for the two vaccines and serious adverse reactions (Guillain-Barre’ Syndrome, anaphylaxis, and seizures) occur at a rate of one per million vaccinations in persons not allergic to eggs; otherwise 10-20% minor adverse reactions such as muscle aches and fever were all that happened. Jeannette Moninger, writing in Parents Magazine, December, 2007 said, “Only 18% of children age 6 months to 2 years are vaccinated despite the fact that an estimated 20,000 babies and toddlers with influenza need to be hospitalized each year according to the…CDC.” The American Academy of Pediatrics noted that in the flu season of 2003-2004, 153 children in 40 states died and therefore the Academy recommends all children from six months to five years of age be vaccinated. Money need not be a barrier; the CDC’s Vaccines for Children provides free vaccines for Native Americans and Medicaid eligible children or children without insurance or with insurance that does not cover vaccines. CDC researchers assure the public that vaccines are safe; in a New England Journal of Medicine article, they reported their extensive research and concluded emphatically that “there is no association between autism and vaccines”. Similarly, no relationship between autism, or any other complication, has been found from the tiny amount of Thiomersal used in some past vaccines. 30% of US school age children get the flu each year and spread the virus to other people; that does not need to happen, and we cannot afford it.

In the pre-vaccination era, Hemophilus Influenza B (Hib) invasive infections and meningitis occurred in one out of 200 children under the age of 5 with about 20,000 cases a year being diagnosed resulting in a case-mortality rate of 2-5%, often due to suffocation from epiglotitis. Brain infections (encephalitis) occur, and the survivors are often neurologically and intellectually devastated. In the post-vaccination era, there has been a 99% reduction in invasive Hib cases and deaths, and serious adverse reactions to the vaccine are very rare and largely preventable.

Poliomyelitis is a great success story: in 1952–the pre-vaccination era–there were 21,000 cases of paralytic disease in the US and an overall case fatality rate of 15-30% in children and 25-75% in adults depending on the type of polio. In the post-vaccination age when 95% of the population is vaccinated, the last known case of wild virus polio infection in America occurred in 1979, affecting a little Amish girl who was not immunized for religious reasons. The risk of contracting polio from live attenuated vaccine is one in 2.4 million doses—a statistically negligible risk. It is costly and personally and publicly unconscionable to withhold vaccinations from children.

Human papilloma virus (HPV), the causative agent for cancer of the cervix and some head and neck cancers, now has an effective vaccine. Unfortunately, because of the sexual and moral implications, a disappointing number of women and parents of girls avoid getting immunized or having their children immunized. Combined with Pap smears, cervical cancer could well be eliminated, but to this date the human and economic costs continue to be high. The benefit to risk ratio for all immunizations is only slightly less than 1.0 (perfect). Many of those infections described could be prevented altogether by obtaining universal immunizations, and still, despite all of the readily available evidence of safety and efficacy, many people avoid having immunizations for such flimsy reasons as fear of the needle.

The onus for all these unhealthy lifestyle choices falls unfairly on We, The People. When insurance companies pay the costs, we absorb them by our increased insurance premiums. Medicaid, Medicare, and other welfare security net programs exist from our taxes.

To be continued…

What do you think?  Share you views, opinions, insights etc. by leaving a comment below.

Carl Douglass – Author
Carl Douglass Books
www.carldouglass.com

“Neurosurgeon Turned Author Writes With Gripping Realism”

To experience Carl’s compelling works, follow the link below:

Books By Carl Douglass

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Featured, Health Care Reform | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
Cover of "Hospital-Based Emergency Care: ...

Cover via Amazon

It is a revelation to infrequent ER visitors to find how much medical service has changed in the past ten years. Hospitals are forced to board patients in hallways for two days or more with marginal care. Patients are seen helping patients because ER staffs are stretched too thin, and hospital beds are full. ERs assume less responsibility for waiting patients who are often not checked in until a long wait has already occurred.

In the 1993 and earlier era when I was in active practice, it was common for hospitals to require ER coverage as a requirement of obtaining privileges to practice in the hospital by providers. This constituted a sort of soft slavery since relatively few ER patients paid the consultants, and from that set of patients came the greatest risk of medical malpractice suits.

Currently, there has been a dramatic shift: Physicians and other providers often refuse to take call or require at least reasonable compensation for their heretofore thankless nighttime, weekend, and holiday work.

Consequently, there has developed a critical shortage of surgeons and other physicians who are willing to take call and to provide emergency and especially trauma services.

Among several reasons are the growing fragmentation of generalists into subspecialties, perceived and actual inadequacies in reimbursement, and new laws prohibiting residents in training from working more than eighty hours a week.

Dr. Maa makes a note of the fact that,

“A staggering three-quarters of hospitals report difficulty finding specialists to take emergency and trauma calls”.

In California, according to the California Association of Neurosurgeons, there not enough neurosurgeons for every hospital to have even one such specialist, let alone full emergency room coverage.

In July 2006, the prestigious Institute of Medicine (IOM) presented a report entitled,

Hospital-Based Emergency Care: At the Breaking Point.

The title says it all. The result has been failure of multiple ERs in several states to be able to maintain an adequate level of care by crucial specialties or to survive financially, and they close. Closure of the ERs contributes to the failure of hospitals themselves; so, Americans have fewer hospitals to take care of them; the hospitals available may be less qualified for serious conditions including complicated trauma, and those hospitals are farther away than those that were available ten years ago.

Across the nation, increasing patient volume, declining resources, and a diminishing supply of care providers is a serious challenge for America. The hardest hit are the poor who often depend on the nearest major hospital to provide their care. When that hospital fails, as did Los Angeles County Hospital, what are those impoverished, uninsured, or underinsured people to do?

Leaving aside salient issues of humanism, we need to deal with the staggering financial facts and implications of our health care system and to recognize that the chaotic and inefficient status quo cannot persist indefinitely. Joseph Q. Jarvis, MD, speaking for the Utah Medical Association (UMA), cited some sobering facts and statistics.

Perhaps the most telling is:

“The United Way of Utah published a study of the causes of bankruptcy in Utah, concluding that the cost of illness and injury care contributed to family financial insolvency…”

Every state in the union could make very much the same statement. Harvard University researchers found that the average out-of-pocket medical debt for Americans filing for bankruptcy each year was $12,000, and 50% of filings were partly the result of medical expenses.

Every 30 seconds an American files for bankruptcy in the aftermath of a serious health problem. 25% of Americans reported having problems with housing owing to medical debt including failure to make rent, to make a mortgage payment, or developed a bad credit rating.

A study of Iowans revealed that in order to cope with rising health insurance costs 86% had to cut back on how much they could save; 44% had to cut back on heating expenses and food. Retiring elderly couples will need between $200,000 and $300,000 in their lifetime on average to pay for the most basic medical coverage.

Bear in mind that 77 million baby boomers are fairly rapidly beginning to retire and to become consumers instead of payers into the tax base that supports health care, a significant cost shift from the private to the public sector. Baby boomers began to qualify for Medicare in 2011. Perhaps the PPACA, so highly touted by the Obama administration, will turn around this bleak picture; but I, for one, will not hold my breath until it happens.

According to the NCOHC, Americans spend 4.3 times on health care as on National Defense—17.4% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the United States. Mark N. Blair, MD, President of the UMA, elaborated with several telling and little recognized facts. He indicated that in 2005 the GDP of the United States was a nearly incomprehensible 1.987 trillion dollars for health care alone ($6,700 per person per year), an increase of 7% over 2004. [That is $5 billion a day.] He said,

“This number reflects many aspects of health care such as personal consumption of goods and services, domestic investments in medical building and hospital real estate, government consumption and gross investments, home and volunteer health production (health food goods and supplements), and labor associated with health care including sports, exercise, recreation, volunteer activities, travel for care, and other health promoting actions.”

USA Today reported that, in an average year, the costs were divided as follows:

Hospital care 30%, physician clinical services 21%, prescription drugs 10%, dental and other professionals 10%, administration 7%, investment 7%, nursing homes 6%, government public health activities 3%, other medical products 3%, and home health care 2%.

New laws notwithstanding, our costs continue to rise. I had a series of illness during the past year, and the cost of medications alone was $25,000. Were it not for Medicare, my wife and I would soon be living out of our car if our expenditures were to continue at that rate.

Dr. Blair stressed that we spend double or even triple the amount on health care as do other countries. We expend over 17.4% of our GDP while Switzerland spends 10.9%, Germany 10.7%.

By 2015 it is estimated that we will increase our costs to over $4.0 trillion—20% of the US GDP. By then every individual in our country will be burdened with a share of the cost exceeding $13,000.

Comparative costs per capita for research and development in the US, in US dollars, came to 61.5, compared to Canada’s 30.9, and the United Kingdom’s 11.08. US private health insurance only pays for 36%; the average annual premium for a family of four in 2005 was $11,500 and $4,200 for an individual, and premium costs for employee based programs rose 7.7% in 2006, an increase of 87% since 2000. Employees themselves contributed 143% more for their insurance since then.

Average out-of-pocket expenditures by Americans under age 65 for health insurance, deductibles, and co-payments rose 115% during the same period. To put those staggering increases into perspective, it is well to note that inflation in the US increased by only 4% per year–a cumulative inflation of 18%, and cumulative wage growth was only 20% in the same period.

The NCOHC made this somber prediction,

“Unless something changes drastically, health insurance costs will overtake profits by 2008”.

Workers contributed 10% more in 2006 than they did in 2005 as employers continually shift health care costs to their employees. In 2005 the federal government paid 34%, state and local governments paid 11%, and individual patients paid 15% out of pocket for health care.

47 million of our citizens had no health insurance prior to 2010; and even after the passage of the PPACA, progress has been very slow to corral the large percentage of our population into the system. 23% of those people have had to make major life changes to compensate and to pay bills. 30% of people polled by USA Today/ABC stated that they had a family member who delayed medical care in the past year and 7% had a problem paying medical bills.

The president of the NCOHC stated that, due to cost increases, “the number of uninsured Americans may have increased, just in 2001 and 2002, by 6 million”. Despite punitive sanctions under the PPACA, the number of uninsured has not appreciably improved nor has the havoc they bring to the rest of Americans who pay a significant portion of the bills they incur.

Costs have continued to rise; The US Department of Health and Human Services reported that in 1970, the average out-of-pocket costs per person was $119, and in 2004 that figure had risen to $788; the annual growth of insurance premiums was 1% in 1996, and 7-16% from 2000 to 2005. The amount spent per person for all health care costs increased by 74% between 1994 and 2004.

National Health Expenditures (NHE) in 2004 were 17.6 times higher than in 1970 while the Consumer Price Index increased by only 4.9% in the same period.

Physicians, hospitals, and prescription drugs had an annual growth rate on average of 8.0-9.0% from 1964 to 2004 while the CPI increased by only 2.7% in that extended period. [HHS Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Actuary].

The number of uninsured or underinsured Americans climbs in direct proportion. All negative aspects of the nation’s health care delivery “system” continue to escalate. Perhaps the PPACA will bear fruit and save us from ourselves; it has not done so yet. Perhaps doctors, hospitals, pharmaceutical and medical device companies will rally together to make health care affordable and accessible. We the People will either force a more efficient and frugal system on our country, or we see bankruptcy on national, state, county, city and personal levels. All other democracies in history have failed. It is not at all impossible that ours will also as a result of our profligate inefficiency, greed, and waste driven by our overheated and failing medical care delivery “system”. I use quotes around “system” because we do not have a system. We only have a disparate, inefficient, poorly coordinated, and maybe even irretrievably flawed approach.

To be continued…

What do you think?  Share you views, opinions, insights etc. by leaving a comment below.

Carl Douglass – Author
Carl Douglass Books
www.carldouglass.com

“Neurosurgeon Turned Author Writes With Gripping Realism”

To experience Carl’s compelling works, follow the link below:

Books By Carl Douglass

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Featured, Health Care Reform | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment